Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,730 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,730 m of the 3,195 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 587 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at KFLL Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport. This process took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 10L, with a takeoff distance of 1,693 meters, which accounted for 71% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 157 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 24°C temperature and a wind speed of 4 knots at 19°. The crosswind was 4 knots, while the headwind was 1 knot. After departing from Fort Lauderdale, the aircraft began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile northeast of Dania Beach, Florida. The climb took 21 minutes, during which the aircraft ascended from 963 feet above sea level to 35,010 feet above sea level, covering a distance of 134 nautical miles.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 4 miles northeast of FD74 Gamebird Groves Airstrip St Cloud, Florida. This cruise phase lasted for 113 minutes, covering a distance of 842 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 3 miles southwest of Sugar Grove, Pennsylvania. The descent took 26 minutes, during which the aircraft descended from 35,020 feet above sea level to 3,096 feet above sea level, covering a distance of 131 nautical miles.
After the descent, the aircraft entered another level cruise, starting 1 mile southwest of Milton, Ontario, Canada. This cruise phase lasted for 4 minutes, covering a distance of 12 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 05 at CYYZ Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport, approaching from the southwest at a heading of 46.0°. The local weather conditions at Toronto were -10°C temperature and a wind speed of 8 knots at 310°.
The aircraft landed on runway 05, with a runway length of 3,195 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 139 knots. However, the touchdown speed was a little fast at 133 knots, and the touchdown rate was fair at -255 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was also very good. The total landing distance was 1,649 meters, which accounted for 52% of the runway.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 7 minutes and covering a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,129 nautical miles, taking 180 minutes, and the aircraft used 6,845 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at CYYZ Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport, achieving a score of 96.3%. The aircraft approached the runway from the southwest, heading 46.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,472 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with good control, and the aircraft landed on runway 05, which has a length of 3,195 meters.
The threshold height was satisfactory, and the threshold speed was maintained at 139 knots, indicating a well-executed approach. However, the touchdown point was 170 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. The touchdown speed of 133 knots was slightly faster than desired, but the touchdown rate of -255 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -10°C and a wind speed of 8 knots from 310°. This resulted in a crosswind of 8 knots and a tailwind of 1 knot, which may have contributed to the slightly faster touchdown speed. Despite these conditions, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was well-aligned with the runway.
The total landing distance of 1,649 meters was 52% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft was well-controlled during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was executed with good control and precision, resulting in a high score of 96.3%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values