Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,944 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 471 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 12 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 17 at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland, with a takeoff distance of 1,551 meters, which accounted for 64% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 160 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 15°C temperature and a wind speed of 13 knots at 140 degrees. The crosswind was 7 knots, while the headwind was 11 knots. The enroute climb started approximately 1 mile south of Flesland, with the aircraft ascending from 1,082 feet above sea level to 27,864 feet above sea level, a vertical increase of 26,782 feet, in just 15 minutes and covering a distance of 76 nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 14 miles southwest of Geilo, Norway, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 13 nautical miles. However, this was short-lived, as the aircraft soon began its descent, starting 6 miles southwest of ENDI Geilo Airport Dagali Dagali. The descent from 28,355 feet above sea level to 9,791 feet above sea level, a decrease of 18,564 feet, took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 65 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, this time starting 5 miles southwest of Eina, Norway, and lasting for 5 minutes, covering a distance of 17 nautical miles. The final descent phase began 4 miles north of Skreia, Norway, with the aircraft descending from 9,423 feet above sea level to 1,958 feet above sea level, a decrease of 7,464 feet, in just 7 minutes and covering a distance of 29 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its final approach to runway 19L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, from the north, heading 196.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,266 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with the aircraft touching down on the runway 54 meters beyond the touchdown zone. Although the touchdown speed was a little fast at 130 knots, the touchdown rate was good at -186 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 14°C temperature and a wind speed of 10 knots at 160 degrees, with a crosswind of 6 knots and a headwind of 8 knots. The total landing distance was 881 meters, accounting for 30% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect. After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, a process that took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
In total, the flight covered a distance of 208 nautical miles, took 48 minutes, and used 2,190 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 99.8%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 196.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,266 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed on runway 19L, which has a length of 2,944 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it approached the runway. The threshold speed of 138 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's skill in managing the aircraft's speed during the landing phase. However, the touchdown speed of 130 knots was slightly faster than desired, which may have been due to the pilot's decision to flare the aircraft slightly earlier than necessary.
The touchdown point was 54 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown rate of -186 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating that the aircraft touched down smoothly and without excessive deceleration. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to align the aircraft with the runway centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 14°C and a wind speed of 10 knots from 160°. The crosswind component was 6 knots, while the headwind component was 8 knots. These conditions were well within the acceptable range for a landing, and the pilot's decision to land with a headwind was likely a deliberate choice to minimize the impact of the crosswind.
The total landing distance of 881 meters was 30% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. This indicates that the pilot was able to bring the aircraft to a stop quickly and efficiently, without excessive braking or deceleration. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was executed with precision and skill, and the pilot's decision-making and flying skills were evident throughout the approach and landing phase. The score of 99.8% reflects the high level of proficiency demonstrated by the pilot during this landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values