Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 13 stages, 11 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,678 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,678 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 820 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 88.0% indicates a strong performance with room for improvement in certain areas. Let's break down the analysis of each phase of the landing to provide a more detailed understanding.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that there was a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. This may have caused the aircraft to approach the runway at a steeper angle than optimal, potentially affecting the overall landing quality. Moving forward, a focus on maintaining a steady descent path within the glideslope limits can help improve future landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is encouraging to see that the threshold height was good and the landing flare was excellent. This indicates that the pilot successfully controlled the aircraft during the crucial moments before touchdown, ensuring a smooth and safe landing. Building on this strong foundation, continued practice and attention to detail can further enhance these skills.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was excellent, showcasing the pilot's ability to land the aircraft with precision. While the speed was slightly above target, this can be adjusted with practice and experience. It is worth noting that the touchdown point was very long, using more than 50% of the available runway. This suggests potential room for improvement in aiming for a more efficient use of runway space in future landings.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was very good, indicating the successful control of the aircraft during the post-touchdown phase. This is essential for a safe and effective landing, and it is encouraging to see this aspect perform well.
Overall, the landing score of 88.0% reflects a solid performance with clear strengths in areas such as landing flare and touchdown rate. By focusing on improving the descent path, touchdown point, and speed control, the pilot can work towards achieving even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of the landing process. Your dedication to improvement will undoubtedly lead to further success in your aviation endeavors.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values