Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Monitor your speed
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Start to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,527 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 160 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Boeing 747-8 began with a 5-minute taxi from the parking area to the runway, covering 3 nm. The departure took place from runway 09R at EGLL London Heathrow Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,567 m (47% of the runway). The liftoff speed was 188 kn. The local weather at the time of departure was 18 °C with a wind speed of 3 kn coming from 350 °, resulting in a crosswind of 3 kn and a tailwind of 1 kn.
During the enroute climb, the aircraft started climbing 1 mile north of Feltham (Greater London, England), going from 1,111 ft asl to 5,908 ft asl, covering 11 nm in 3 minutes. The enroute level cruise began overhead Camden Town (Greater London, England) and lasted 2 minutes, covering 5 nm. Another enroute climb started 1 mile south-west of Enfield Town (Greater London, England), climbing from 6,318 ft asl to 29,744 ft asl, an increase of 23,426 ft in 11 minutes, covering 69 nm.
The enroute descent started 8 miles south-east of Orford (Suffolk, England), descending from 29,744 ft asl to 1,815 ft asl, covering 115 nm in 20 minutes. The landing occurred on runway 18R at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, which has a runway length of 3,527 m. The height at the threshold was 22 ft agl, and the speed at the threshold was 153 kn. The touchdown occurred 158 m from the threshold, with a touchdown speed of 152 kn and a VSI of -700 ft/m. The local weather at the time of landing was 15 °C with a wind speed of 3 kn from 120 °, resulting in a crosswind of 3 kn and a headwind of 1 kn. The total landing distance was 1,287 m, which was 36% of the runway.
Finally, the taxi from the runway to the parking area took 10 minutes and covered 3 nm. The total flight distance was 213 nm, which took 64 minutes to complete and consumed 7,491 kg of fuel.
Let's start by acknowledging the positive aspects of the aircraft landing score, which was 86.2%. The Approach Phase of the landing had excellent glideslope alignment, indicating that the pilot did a great job in maintaining the correct descent angle towards the runway. This is crucial for a safe and smooth landing as it ensures the aircraft is on the correct path towards the touchdown zone.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, there were a mix of good and poor elements. The good news is that the threshold height was good, meaning the aircraft approached the runway at the right altitude. However, there was a very poor landing flare during this phase. The landing flare is the maneuver that pilots use to reduce the rate of descent just before touchdown, and it seems like there may have been some room for improvement in this area.
In the Touchdown Phase, there were both positive and negative aspects. The touchdown rate was noted as very heavy, indicating that the aircraft landed with excessive force. Additionally, the speed at touchdown was slightly above target, which could have contributed to the heavy touchdown. On the bright side, the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone, meaning the aircraft landed where it was supposed to on the runway. However, the runway touchdown position being 49 ft from the centerline suggests some deviation from the ideal touchdown point.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was noted as 64 ft from the centerline. This indicates that there was some lateral deviation during the rollout after landing. While not ideal, this can be corrected with practice and attention to detail during future landings.
Overall, while there were areas for improvement in the landing score analysis, it's important to remember that landing an aircraft is a complex and challenging task. By identifying the specific areas that need work, pilots can focus on improving their skills and techniques to achieve smoother and safer landings in the future. Keep practicing, stay focused on the fundamentals, and strive for continuous improvement in each phase of the landing process. Your dedication and hard work will pay off in the long run.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values