Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down before tight turns
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 29 stages, 27 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
Side view — the last 1,627 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,627 m of the 2,914 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 597 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 94.5% is impressive and demonstrates strong piloting skills. The Approach Phase stood out with excellent glideslope alignment, showing that the pilot was able to maintain a steady descent towards the runway. While the speed was slightly above target, this minor discrepancy did not greatly impact the overall score.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the good threshold height indicates that the pilot was able to judge the descent to the runway accurately. However, the poor landing flare suggests that there may be room for improvement in maintaining a smooth and controlled descent just before touchdown. Despite this, the Touchdown Phase highlighted a firm touchdown rate, indicating a decisive and confident landing. Although the speed was slightly above target, it did not detract significantly from the overall performance.
In terms of touchdown point, the fact that it was 180 m beyond the touchdown zone is noteworthy and suggests the pilot may have misjudged the approach slightly. Additionally, the runway touchdown position being 7.7 m from the centreline may indicate a need for better alignment during the final stages of landing.
Finally, the Rollout Phase showed a runway alignment of 6.6 m from the centreline, indicating that there may have been some deviation from the desired path during the rollout. This aspect could be improved upon to enhance overall landing accuracy.
In conclusion, while there are areas for improvement, the pilot should be commended for achieving a high landing score of 94.5%. With continued practice and focus on maintaining alignment, speed control, and touchdown precision, the pilot has the potential to further refine their landing technique and strive for even higher scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in every phase of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values