Track every flight, analyse your performance,
and master your flying skills with My FS Flights
Get 10 flights free every month!
Tracked and analysed flights over miles
This flight was conducted in a Cessna C172 aircraft, starting with an enroute climb from an initial altitude of 551 feet above sea level (asl) to a maximum altitude of 2,340 ft asl. The climb was rapid, with an increase of 1,789 ft in just 3 minutes, covering a distance of 2 nautical miles (nm). This phase of the flight was completed in a short period, showcasing the aircraft's ability to ascend quickly.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which began 1 mile east of the EDAY Strausberg Airfield in Strausberg, Brandenburg, Germany. This phase lasted for 2 minutes, during which the aircraft maintained a steady altitude and covered a distance of 1 nm. The level cruise phase was a brief but essential part of the flight, allowing the aircraft to reach a stable cruising altitude.
The enroute descent phase began overhead the EDAY Strausberg Airfield, with the aircraft descending from 2,318 ft asl to 417 ft asl. This descent was also rapid, with a decrease of 1,901 ft in just 3 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nm. The aircraft's ability to descend quickly and efficiently was demonstrated during this phase of the flight.
The landing phase was conducted on runway 23 at the EDAY Strausberg Airfield, which has a length of 1,189 meters. The threshold height at 130 ft above ground level (agl) was found to be excessively over target, indicating that the aircraft touched down slightly higher than intended. However, the threshold speed of 64 kt was slightly above target, suggesting that the aircraft was approaching the runway at a suitable speed. The touchdown distance of 15 meters was good, and the touchdown speed of 55 kt was also within acceptable limits. The touchdown rate of -186 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating a smooth and controlled landing.
One area for improvement was the runway touchdown position, which was slightly misaligned by 4.4 meters from the centreline. This may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's approach path or a miscalculation of the runway alignment. However, the local weather conditions, with a temperature of 12 °C, did not appear to have any significant impact on the flight.
In terms of performance, the aircraft used 7 kg of fuel to complete the flight, which covered a total distance of 4 nm. The flight duration was 17 minutes, indicating a relatively short and efficient flight. Overall, the flight demonstrated the Cessna C172's ability to climb, cruise, and descend efficiently, as well as its capacity for a smooth and controlled landing.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started overhead Strausberg (Brandenburg, Germany). Climbing from 551 ft asl to 2,340 ft asl, an increase of 1,789 ft in 3 minutes and covering 2 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 77 kt 68 kt min to max 94 kt |
70 | 94 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 6.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 29.0 ° |
2.8 | 2.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.79 g min to max 1.15 g |
0.96 | 1.03 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 825 fpm -141 fpm min to max 1,576 fpm |
933 | 136 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,396 ft asl 551 ft asl min to max 2,340 ft asl |
551 | 2,340 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -9.6 ° -14.4 ° min to max -2.0 ° |
-12.4 | -2.4 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Taxi Lights On at 00:09:43 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights On at 00:09:43 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights On at 00:09:43 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights On at 00:09:43 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights On at 00:09:43 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 00:09:43 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 00:09:43 |
|||
| Info |
Parking Brake Off at 00:09:43 |
Enroute level cruise started 1 mile east of EDAY Strausberg Airfield Strausberg (Brandenburg, Germany) and lasted 2 minutes, covering 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average altitude 2,353 ft asl 2,300 ft asl min to max 2,375 ft asl |
2,351 | 2,300 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 96 kt 94 kt min to max 100 kt |
94 | 98 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 15.0 ° 0.1 ° min to max 23.8 ° |
7.8 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.04 g 0.96 g min to max 1.22 g |
1.00 | 1.03 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.8 ° -3.6 ° min to max 0.9 ° |
-2.3 | -1.4 ° |
Enroute descent started overhead EDAY Strausberg Airfield Strausberg (Brandenburg, Germany). Descent from 2,318 ft asl to 417 ft asl, a decrease of 1,901 ft in 3 minutes and covering less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 66 kt 60 kt min to max 94 kt |
94 | 64 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 7.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 19.5 ° |
0.7 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.82 g min to max 1.15 g |
0.97 | 0.85 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -599 fpm -995 fpm min to max 147 fpm |
147 | -857 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,329 ft asl 417 ft asl min to max 2,318 ft asl |
2,318 | 417 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.1 ° -5.9 ° min to max 6.7 ° |
-2.4 | 6.7 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:17:06 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:17:06 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:17:06 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:17:06 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:17:06 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:17:17 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:17:17 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:17:17 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:17:17 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:17:17 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:17:26 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:17:26 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:17:26 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:17:26 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:17:26 |
Landing on runway 23 at EDAY Strausberg Airfield, runway length 1,189 m. Threshold height at 130 ft agl was excessively over target. Threshold speed was slightly above target at 64 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was slightly above target at 64 kt. Target 60 kt |
|||
| 0 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 0 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 0 % |
Heading variation 25.4 ° -179.6 ° min to max 179.2 ° |
-0.2 | 0.3 ° | |
| 41.58 % |
Average bank angle 4.0 ° 0.0 ° min to max 24.2 ° |
2.4 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.69 g min to max 1.46 g |
0.96 | 1.09 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 67 kt 55 kt min to max 99 kt |
64 | 55 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -131 fpm -1,102 fpm min to max 1,780 fpm |
-985 | -186 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 497 ft agl -14 ft agl min to max 2,165 ft agl |
130 | -12 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -3.5 ° -17.4 ° min to max 6.9 ° |
6.7 | -6.0 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 00:17:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 00:17:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 00:17:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 00:17:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 00:17:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:25:50 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:25:50 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:25:50 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:25:50 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:25:50 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:26:12 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:26:12 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:26:12 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:26:12 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:26:12 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:26:23 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:26:23 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:26:23 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:26:23 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 00:26:23 |
Touchdown distance was good at 15 m. Touchdown speed at 55 kt was good. Touchdown rate was good at -186 fpm. Runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.4 m from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 12 °C. .
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 97.02 % |
Touchdown VSI was -186 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 15 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 55 kt Target below 57 kt |
|||
| 95 % |
Runway alignment max 4.42 m 4.26 m left |
4.33 | 4.01 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.1 ° 1.0 ° min to max 1.2 ° |
1.0 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.93 g min to max 1.09 g |
1.09 | 1.06 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 54 kt 54 kt min to max 55 kt |
55 | 54 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -7.3 ° -9.2 ° min to max -6.0 ° |
-6.0 | -9.2 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 47 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 24 kt 20 kt min to max 26 kt |
26 | 25 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -6.6 ° -11.2 ° min to max -3.8 ° |
-9.4 | -4.4 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.9 ° |
0.9 | 0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.74 g min to max 1.31 g |
1.06 | 0.74 g |
The Cessna C172 aircraft successfully landed on runway 23 at EDAY Strausberg Airfield, achieving a score of 66.3%. The landing was conducted under local weather conditions with a temperature of 12 °C.
Upon analysis, it appears that the aircraft's threshold height at 130 ft above ground level (agl) was excessively over the target, indicating that the pilot may have descended slightly too late or not utilized the optimal descent rate. However, the threshold speed of 64 kt was only slightly above the target, suggesting that the pilot maintained control and managed the aircraft's speed effectively.
The touchdown distance of 15 m was considered good, indicating that the pilot successfully managed the aircraft's descent and approach speed. The touchdown speed of 55 kt was also within the acceptable range, further emphasizing the pilot's ability to control the aircraft's speed during the landing. The touchdown rate of -186 fpm was also good, indicating that the pilot maintained a stable and controlled descent.
One area for improvement was the runway touchdown position, which was slightly misaligned by 4.4 m from the centreline. This may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's approach or alignment with the runway. Nevertheless, the overall performance of the pilot and the aircraft was satisfactory, and the landing was considered successful.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values