Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,944 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 437 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 27 at Trondheim Airport, Værnes, with a takeoff distance of 1,422 meters, which was 60% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 161 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 9°C temperature and a wind speed of 17 knots at 330°. The crosswind was 15 knots, while the headwind was 9 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile northwest of Hell, Trondelag, Norway, and the aircraft climbed from an altitude of 1,012 feet above sea level to 28,802 feet above sea level, an increase of 27,790 feet in 17 minutes, covering a distance of 104 nautical miles.
The enroute descent began 6 miles west of Atna Koppang, Innlandet, Norway, and the aircraft descended from 28,963 feet above sea level to 8,401 feet above sea level, a decrease of 20,562 feet in 14 minutes, covering a distance of 89 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started 1 mile west of Hønefoss Airfield, Eggemoen Hønefoss, Viken, Norway, and lasted for 7 minutes, covering a distance of 27 nautical miles.
The enroute descent began again 3 miles north of Hyggen, Viken, Norway, and the aircraft descended from 8,315 feet above sea level to 1,958 feet above sea level, a decrease of 6,357 feet in 8 minutes, covering a distance of 29 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 01R at Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, was made from the south, heading 16.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,275 feet above ground level.
However, the aircraft performed a go-around at 341 feet above ground level. The landing was eventually made on runway 01R at Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a runway length of 2,944 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 131 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 438 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 124 knots. The touchdown rate was good at -170 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 8°C temperature and a wind speed of 18 knots at 360°. The crosswind was 5 knots, while the headwind was 17 knots. The total landing distance was 943 meters, which was 32% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was perfect. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 263 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 75 minutes. The aircraft used 2,913 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 01R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with an impressive score of 99.8%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 16.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,275 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot's final approach was executed with precision, taking into account the local weather conditions.
The temperature at the time of landing was 8°C, with a wind speed of 18 knots blowing from the north (360°). This resulted in a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 17 knots, which the pilot effectively managed during the landing. The aircraft's speed and altitude were well-controlled, with a threshold speed of 131 knots and a good threshold height.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was slightly higher than desired, at 124 knots, but the touchdown rate of -170 feet per minute (fpm) was within the acceptable range. The runway touchdown alignment was excellent, indicating that the pilot had successfully aligned the aircraft with the runway centerline.
The total landing distance of 943 meters was 32% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. This suggests that the pilot had effectively managed the aircraft's descent and touchdown, minimizing the use of runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, indicating that the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was executed with precision and control, demonstrating the pilot's expertise and the aircraft's capabilities. The score of 99.8% reflects the high level of proficiency and safety achieved during this landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values