Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 27 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,803 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 14 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 90.4% is quite good, indicating a strong performance during the landing process. Let's break down the different phases of the landing to provide a more detailed analysis and some constructive feedback.
During the Approach Phase, the descent path was below the glideslope limit, which can be a cause for concern as it may lead to an unstable approach. Additionally, the speed was well above the target, which could indicate a lack of proper speed management. Moving forward, it would be beneficial to ensure the descent path is within the glideslope limits and to closely monitor and adjust the speed to meet the target.
In the Landing Phase, while the threshold height was good, the landing flare was very poor. A smooth and controlled landing flare is essential for a safe and comfortable touchdown. It is important to work on improving this aspect to enhance the overall landing performance.
During the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was heavy, and the speed was above target. It is crucial to achieve a smooth touchdown to minimize wear and tear on the aircraft and ensure passenger comfort. Additionally, landing within the touchdown zone is important for safety and runway efficiency. The touchdown position on the runway was good, which is a positive aspect of the landing.
In the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off, being 4.3 meters from the centerline. Proper runway alignment is essential for safe taxiing and overall runway operation. It would be beneficial to focus on improving runway alignment for future landings.
Overall, while there were some areas for improvement identified in the landing analysis, achieving a score of 90.4% is commendable. By addressing the areas that need improvement and continuing to practice and refine landing techniques, even better landing performance can be achieved. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in all phases of aircraft operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values