Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down before tight turns
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,666 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,666 m of the 2,652 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 611 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First and foremost, I want to commend the pilot for achieving a landing score of 92.3%. This is a solid result and shows great skill and proficiency in executing the landing phases of the aircraft.
During the Approach Phase, it is evident that the pilot had excellent glideslope alignment, which is crucial for a safe and smooth descent towards the runway. This indicates a good understanding and execution of approach procedures.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, while the threshold height was slightly above target, it is a minor point that can be easily improved upon with practice. However, the very poor landing flare is something that could use some attention. A proper landing flare helps to cushion the touchdown and ensures a smoother landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the hard touchdown rate and slightly above target speed are areas that could be worked on to improve the overall landing experience. Additionally, the touchdown point being 193 m beyond the touchdown zone is something that should be avoided, as it can lead to safety concerns and unnecessary runway occupation.
Furthermore, the runway touchdown position being 2.2 m from the centerline is another point that could be improved upon to enhance precision during landings. Additionally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 3.8 m from the centerline could be tightened up to ensure a straight and centered rollout.
Overall, while this landing score is already quite good, there are areas where some refinement and improvement could be made to further enhance the pilot's skills and performance during landings. With dedication, practice, and a focus on these specific areas, I have no doubt that even better landing scores can be achieved in the future. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in all aspects of aircraft operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values