Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 143 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 162 kt, 19 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 143 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,195 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 211 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A319, then departed from runway 01L at KTPA Tampa International Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,674 meters, which was 50% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 162 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 21 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 12 knots at a direction of 30 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 6 knots and a headwind of 10 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile north of KTPA Tampa International Airport, and climbed from an altitude of 623 feet above sea level to 37,005 feet above sea level, an increase of 36,382 feet, in 18 minutes and covering a distance of 118 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 3 miles north of Fort White, Florida, and lasted for 94 minutes, covering a distance of 725 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 4 miles east of Paraport Ultralight Flightpark Warren in Pennsylvania, and descended from 37,020 feet above sea level to 2,995 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,025 feet, in 25 minutes and covering a distance of 122 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile northeast of Malvern, Ontario, Canada, and lasted for 10 minutes, covering a distance of 16 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 23 at CYYZ Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport was made from the northeast, heading 226.0 degrees, at an altitude of 1,566 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
The landing on runway 23 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 212 meters, which was good, and a touchdown speed of 118 knots, which was also good. However, the touchdown rate was very hard, at -567 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 12.0 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -12 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 16 knots at a direction of 220 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 16 knots.
The total landing distance was 688 meters, which was 22% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 11.6 meters from the centerline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 992 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 165 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 5,368 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A319 aircraft successfully landed at CYYZ Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport, but with some notable deviations from the ideal landing parameters. The final approach was initiated from the north east, heading 226.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,566 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on runway 23, which has a length of 3,195 meters.
The threshold height at 98 feet agl was significantly above the target, indicating that the aircraft may have been slightly high on its approach. However, the threshold speed of 128 knots was good, suggesting that the pilot maintained a suitable airspeed during the final stages of the approach. The touchdown distance of 212 meters was also within acceptable limits, and the touchdown speed of 118 knots was good.
Despite these positive aspects, the touchdown rate was very hard at -567 feet per minute (fpm), which may indicate that the pilot may have been slightly too aggressive with the descent. Furthermore, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 12.0 meters from the centreline, which could have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's alignment or a slight crosswind component.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of -12°C and a wind speed of 16 knots from 220°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 16 knots, which would have helped to stabilize the aircraft during the approach. The total landing distance of 688 meters was 22% of the runway length, which is within acceptable limits.
During the rollout phase, the aircraft's alignment was slightly misaligned by 11.6 meters from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's alignment or a slight crosswind component. Overall, while the landing was successful, there were some notable deviations from the ideal landing parameters that could be addressed through further training or adjustments to the pilot's technique.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values