Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 19 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,999 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 288 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 16 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen. The takeoff distance was 1,745 meters, which accounted for 49% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 163 knots, and the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of -5°C, with a wind speed of 21 knots at a direction of 10°. The crosswind was 2 knots, and the headwind was 21 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it began its enroute climb, which started overhead Gardermoen. The climb took 25 minutes and covered a distance of 158 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from an altitude of 1,779 feet above sea level to 33,536 feet above sea level, an increase of 31,757 feet. The enroute level cruise then started 19 miles northeast of Roros, and it lasted for 44 minutes, covering a distance of 332 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 2 miles southwest of Kjopsvik, and it took 23 minutes to descend from an altitude of 33,194 feet above sea level to 3,590 feet above sea level, a decrease of 29,604 feet. The descent covered a distance of 124 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise, which started 12 miles north of Movik and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 4 nautical miles.
The final enroute descent started 9 miles north of Movik, and it took 2 minutes to descend from an altitude of 3,185 feet above sea level to 1,746 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,440 feet. The descent covered a distance of 7 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 18 at ENTC Tromsø Airport, Langnes, which was located 4 nautical miles away and at an altitude of 1,694 feet above ground level.
The aircraft landed on runway 18, which had a length of 1,999 meters. The local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of -10°C. The touchdown speed was 145 knots, and the touchdown distance was 290 meters. The touchdown rate was firm at -335 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The total landing distance was 903 meters, which accounted for 45% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also very good.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking, which took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 635 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 106 minutes. The aircraft used 4,850 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at ENTC Tromsø Airport, Langnes, with a score of 97.2%. The final approach was conducted from the north, heading 193.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,694 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft was on a steady course for a smooth landing on runway 18, which has a length of 1,999 meters.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft demonstrated good threshold height, indicating a well-executed approach. The threshold speed of 148 knots was also within the acceptable range, suggesting that the pilot had maintained control and stability throughout the descent. The touchdown distance of 290 meters was also satisfactory, indicating that the aircraft had landed smoothly and without any significant deviation from the intended path.
The touchdown speed of 145 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -335 feet per minute (fpm) was firm but not excessive, indicating a controlled and stable landing. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilot had maintained precise control and alignment throughout the approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of -10°C, which may have presented some challenges for the pilot. However, the aircraft's performance and the pilot's skills were sufficient to overcome these conditions and achieve a successful landing.
The total landing distance of 903 meters was 45% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. This suggests that the pilot had maintained a high degree of control and precision throughout the approach and landing. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the pilot had maintained control and stability throughout the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was a success, with the aircraft demonstrating good performance and the pilot demonstrating excellent skills and control. The score of 97.2% reflects the high level of proficiency and expertise displayed by the pilot and the aircraft.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values