Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 125 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 140 kt, 15 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 125 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Read more in Descent PlanningStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,891 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 450 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking area to the runway, which took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a C750, then departed from runway 26L at EDDM Munich Airport. The takeoff distance was 805 meters, which accounted for 20% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 140 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 10°C, with a wind speed of 15 knots at 250°.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb, which started overhead EDDM Munich Airport. The climb took the aircraft from an altitude of 2,512 feet above sea level to 15,010 feet above sea level, an increase of 12,498 feet in just 5 minutes, covering a distance of 23 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise then began overhead Bruck, lasting for 2 minutes and covering 12 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 2 miles west of Bad Feilnbach, where the aircraft descended from 15,007 feet above sea level to 3,425 feet above sea level, a decrease of 11,582 feet in 9 minutes, covering a distance of 44 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 26 at LOWI Innsbruck Airport was made from the east, heading 262.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,508 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 26 at LOWI Innsbruck Airport was successful, with a touchdown distance of 450 meters, which was 52% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was a little fast at 112 knots, but the touchdown rate was good at -194 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.2 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 7°C, with a wind speed of 3 knots at 270°.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, which took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 88 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 29 minutes. The aircraft used 334 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed at LOWI Innsbruck Airport, achieving a score of 97.1%. The final approach to runway 26 was initiated from the east, with a heading of 262.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,508 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, which has a length of 1,891 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct height as it approached the runway threshold. The threshold speed of 117 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's ability to control the aircraft's speed during the approach. The touchdown distance of 450 meters was also good, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down within a safe distance from the runway threshold.
However, the touchdown speed of 112 knots was slightly faster than the recommended speed, which may indicate that the pilot could have applied more braking or reverse thrust to slow the aircraft down more quickly. The touchdown rate of -194 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down smoothly and without excessive deceleration.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.2 meters from the centerline, which may indicate that the pilot could have made a slight adjustment to the aircraft's heading or pitch to align it more closely with the runway centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 7°C and a wind speed of 3 knots from a direction of 270°, resulting in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 3 knots.
The total landing distance of 980 meters was 52% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned by 9.1 meters from the centerline, which may indicate that the pilot could have made a slight adjustment to the aircraft's heading or pitch to align it more closely with the runway centerline during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated good control and management of the aircraft during the approach and touchdown phases. However, there were some minor deviations from the recommended procedures, which may indicate areas for improvement in the pilot's training or technique.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values