Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 150 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 173 kt, 23 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 150 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Apply steady, continuous back pressure through the flare to arrest the sink smoothly and hold the normal profile, rather than letting it drift.
What happened: The flare did not hold its target profile, with the sink most arrested at 0.1 ft, and this flight then touched down at 194 fpm of sink - a firm arrival. An unsettled flare profile like this usually carries through to a firmer touchdown.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smooth, steadily decreasing sink rate through the flare to touchdown.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,692 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 596 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in question was operated by an Airbus A320 aircraft. The pre-flight taxiing process from the parking area to the runway took 12 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 08L at EDDM Munich Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,437 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 173 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 5°C, with a wind speed of 9 knots at a direction of 99°. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 9 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb 1 mile northeast of EDDM Munich Airport, rising from an altitude of 2,465 feet above sea level to 34,927 feet above sea level, an increase of 32,462 feet, in 18 minutes and covering a distance of 109 nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 2 miles north of Biebelried, Bavaria, Germany, and lasted for 25 minutes, covering a distance of 173 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent from 34,995 feet above sea level to 12,690 feet above sea level, a decrease of 22,306 feet, in 12 minutes and covering a distance of 78 nautical miles. This descent phase started overhead Etalle, Wallonia, Belgium.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 2 miles north of Soupir, Hauts-de-France, France, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 9 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent from 12,408 feet above sea level to 11,257 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,152 feet, in 2 minutes and covering a distance of 8 nautical miles. This descent phase started overhead Crouy, Hauts-de-France, France.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile west of Saint-Pierre-Aigle, Hauts-de-France, France, and lasted for 3 minutes, covering a distance of 17 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent phase, which started 1 mile southwest of Rully, Hauts-de-France, France, and ended with a landing on runway 09L at LFPG Charles de Gaulle International Airport.
The final approach to runway 09L was made from the west, heading 85.0° at an altitude of 1,320 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on a runway with a length of 2,692 meters, and the threshold height was significantly above the target. However, the threshold speed was good at 135 knots. The touchdown point was 168 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 132 knots. The touchdown rate was fair at -284 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C, with a wind speed of 5 knots at a direction of 50°. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 4 knots. The total landing distance was 1,197 meters, which accounted for 44% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect.
The post-landing taxiing process from the runway to the parking area took 10 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 420 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 93 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 3,258 kilograms of
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 09L at LFPG Charles de Gaulle International Airport, achieving an overall score of 86.3%. The aircraft approached the runway from the west, heading 85.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,320 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was conducted with a good threshold speed of 135 knots, which is within the acceptable range for a safe landing.
However, the threshold height at 85 feet agl was significantly above the target, indicating a slight deviation from the ideal approach path. Despite this, the touchdown point was 168 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown speed of 132 knots was a little fast, but not excessively so, and the touchdown rate of -284 feet per minute (fpm) was fair.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 5 knots from a direction of 50°. The crosswind component was 3 knots, while the headwind component was 4 knots. These conditions were relatively calm and did not pose a significant challenge to the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,197 meters was 44% of the runway length, which is a reasonable distance considering the aircraft's weight and the runway's length. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was well under control during the landing roll.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the aircraft touching down safely and rolling out without any issues. While there were some minor deviations from the ideal approach path and touchdown speed, the pilot's skills and the aircraft's performance ensured a safe and controlled landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values