Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Apply small rudder corrections at touchdown, aiming at a point at the far end of the runway, to stay on the centreline.
What happened: Touchdown drifted 5.7 m off the centreline, and landings like this usually carry that drift into the rollout, where the alignment error grew to 9.6 m.
Watch for: Runway centreline: aircraft tracking directly over it through touchdown and rollout.
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,525 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,525 m of the 2,395 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 565 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Málaga-Costa del Sol Airport, the Boeing 737-800 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. As it reached the runway, it initiated its departure roll on runway 13, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 153 knots. The takeoff distance of 1,739 meters accounted for 54% of the runway length, with the aircraft clearing the ground at a height of 1,002 feet above sea level.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it encountered a local temperature of 27°C and a wind speed of 11 knots from a direction of 110°. The crosswind component was minimal at 4 knots, while the headwind component was 10 knots. The enroute climb phase saw the aircraft ascend to 34,996 feet above sea level in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 116 nautical miles. Following this, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, lasting 67 minutes and covering 444 nautical miles. The descent phase that followed saw the aircraft lose 29,045 feet in altitude in 23 minutes, covering 125 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, César Manrique-Lanzarote Airport, it initiated a final approach to runway 03 from the south-west, heading 27.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,240 feet above ground level. The landing was completed on the runway, with the touchdown point located 144 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed of 150 knots was slightly above the target, while the touchdown rate of -226 feet per minute was considered fair. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline, and the runway rollout alignment also showed a slight deviation. The total landing distance of 1,439 meters accounted for 60% of the runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 732 nautical miles, with a flight time of 134 minutes and a fuel consumption of 5,275 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 03 at GCRR César Manrique-Lanzarote Airport, with a final approach from the south west, heading 27.0 ° at 4 nm and 1,240 ft agl. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height of 64 ft agl, which was above the target. However, the threshold speed of 153 kt was significantly higher than the target, indicating a potential for a long rollout.
The aircraft touched down 144 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 150 kt, which was fast. The touchdown rate of -226 fpm was fair, but could be improved. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 6.2 m from the centreline, which may have contributed to the long rollout. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 23 °C and a headwind of 22 kt, may have also played a role in the aircraft's performance.
The total landing distance of 1,439 m was 60% of the runway length, indicating a relatively long rollout. The runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned by 9.6 m from the centreline, which may have been a result of the initial touchdown position. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 87.7%. However, there is room for improvement in terms of approach speed, touchdown speed, and rollout alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values