Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,815 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 365 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing Christchurch International Airport, the Airbus A320 began its journey with a taxiing period of 11 minutes, covering 2 nautical miles to reach the runway. The departure roll commenced on runway 20, with the aircraft lifting off at a speed of 152 knots after a takeoff distance of 1,277 meters, which accounted for 39% of the runway length. The local weather conditions at the time were characterized by a temperature of 14°C and a headwind of 9 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to its enroute level, it ascended from 1,087 feet above sea level to 25,008 feet, an increase of 23,922 feet in 10 minutes, covering 54 nautical miles. The climb phase was followed by a series of level cruises, with the first one commencing 11 miles southwest of Cheviot and lasting 9 minutes, covering 62 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent from 25,009 feet to 15,102 feet in 6 minutes, covering 36 nautical miles, before resuming level flight 14 miles south of Blenheim. The final descent phase started 10 miles southwest of Blenheim, with the aircraft descending from 15,103 feet to 3,463 feet in 9 minutes, covering 36 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a series of short level cruises before beginning its final descent to Wellington International Airport.
The final approach to runway 34 at Wellington International Airport was conducted from the south, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 126 knots and a distance of 366 meters. The touchdown rate was slightly hard at -443 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.1 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 924 meters, accounting for 51% of the runway length. Following a taxiing period of 3 minutes, the aircraft arrived at the parking area, having covered a total distance of 218 nautical miles and consuming 1,943 kilograms of fuel during the 53-minute flight.
The aircraft touched down on runway 34 at NZWN Wellington International Airport with a good threshold height, but slightly above the target threshold speed of 133 kt at 134 kt. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a heading of 3.0° at 4 nm and 1,362 ft above ground level. The touchdown distance of 366 m was within acceptable limits, indicating a well-executed flare. However, the touchdown speed of 126 kt was a little fast, and the touchdown rate of -443 fpm was hard, suggesting a slightly aggressive touchdown.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.1 m from the centreline, which may have been due to the crosswind component of 5 kt. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 13 °C and a headwind of 17 kt, may have also contributed to the slight deviation from the centreline. The total landing distance of 924 m, which accounted for 51% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits.
The rollout phase was executed well, with the aircraft maintaining a very good alignment with the centreline. Overall, the landing was satisfactory, with a score of 94.8%. While there were some minor deviations from the ideal touchdown characteristics, the pilot's skills and the aircraft's performance were sufficient to ensure a safe and controlled landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values