Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,944 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 467 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 31 at Haugesund Airport, Karmøy, with a takeoff distance of 1,190 meters, which was 60% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 147 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 15°C temperature and a wind speed of 9 knots at 290°. The crosswind was 4 knots, while the headwind was 8 knots. After departing from Haugesund, the aircraft began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile west of Visnes in Rogaland Fylke, Norway. The climb took 9 minutes, during which the aircraft ascended from 1,028 feet above sea level to 26,725 feet, an increase of 25,697 feet. The aircraft covered a distance of 85 nautical miles during this climb.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 24 miles west of Rjukan in Vestfold og Telemark, Norway. This cruise lasted for 2 minutes and covered 27 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, starting 14 miles north of Miland in Vestfold og Telemark, Norway. The descent took 5 minutes, during which the aircraft descended from 25,786 feet to 9,918 feet, a decrease of 15,868 feet. The aircraft covered a distance of 46 nautical miles during this descent.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting 4 miles south-east of Nakkerud in Viken, Norway. This cruise lasted for 3 minutes and covered 18 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 3 miles north of Aros in Viken, Norway. The descent took 8 minutes, during which the aircraft descended from 9,899 feet to 1,954 feet, a decrease of 7,944 feet. The aircraft covered a distance of 28 nautical miles during this descent.
As the aircraft approached Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, it began its final approach to runway 01R from the south, heading 16.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,268 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with the aircraft touching down 53 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 129 knots, which was a little fast, but the touchdown rate was good at -194 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 16°C temperature and a wind speed of 5 knots at 148°. The crosswind was 3 knots, while the tailwind was 3 knots. The total landing distance was 1,056 meters, which was 36% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was perfect. After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, a process that took 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 210 nautical miles, and the flight took 35 minutes. The aircraft used 2,052 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 99.8%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 16.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,268 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed on runway 01R, which has a length of 2,944 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it approached the runway. The threshold speed of 136 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing phase. However, the touchdown speed of 129 knots was slightly faster than desired, which may have been due to the pilot's decision to flare the aircraft slightly earlier than necessary.
The touchdown point was 53 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown rate of -194 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating that the aircraft was able to absorb the impact of landing smoothly. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, demonstrating the pilot's skill in aligning the aircraft with the runway centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 16°C and a wind speed of 5 knots from a direction of 148°. The crosswind component was minimal at 3 knots, and the tailwind component was also 3 knots, which had a negligible effect on the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,056 meters was 36% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase and bring it to a stop safely. Overall, the landing was executed with precision and skill, and the pilot's performance was commendable.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values