This flight was conducted in a Cessna C172 aircraft, taking off from a location near Strausberg, Brandenburg, Germany. The enroute climb phase began overhead Strausberg, where the aircraft ascended from an initial altitude of 421 feet above sea level to 887 feet, a gain of 466 feet in just one minute. During this climb, the aircraft covered a distance of one nautical mile.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started one mile southeast of Strausberg. This phase lasted for two minutes and covered a distance of two nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 23 at the Strausberg Airfield, which is located in the north east. At this point, the aircraft was at an altitude of 241 feet above ground level and had traveled zero nautical miles.
The final approach was conducted at a heading of 231.0 degrees, and the aircraft touched down on the runway. The touchdown point was located 95 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone. The aircraft's touchdown speed was 50 knots, which was considered good, and the touchdown rate was an excellent -53 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was also very good.
The local weather conditions during the flight were characterized by a temperature of 12 degrees Celsius. The aircraft's performance was satisfactory, with a total flight distance of three nautical miles and a flight time of three minutes. The fuel consumption during the flight was 1 kilogram. Overall, the flight was conducted smoothly, with the aircraft performing well in terms of speed, altitude, and alignment.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started overhead Strausberg (Brandenburg, Germany). Climbing from 421 ft asl to 887 ft asl, an increase of 466 ft in 1 minutes and covering 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 86 kt 79 kt min to max 102 kt |
81 | 102 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 11.0 ° 0.1 ° min to max 30.6 ° |
2.4 | 20.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.03 g 0.79 g min to max 1.33 g |
1.00 | 1.11 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 396 fpm -611 fpm min to max 1,004 fpm |
929 | -336 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 792 ft asl 421 ft asl min to max 939 ft asl |
421 | 887 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -5.1 ° -9.9 ° min to max 2.1 ° |
-9.4 | 0.4 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Taxi Lights On at 00:05:25 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights On at 00:05:25 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights On at 00:05:25 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights On at 00:05:25 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights On at 00:05:25 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 00:05:25 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 00:05:25 |
|||
| Info |
Parking Brake Off at 00:05:25 |
Enroute level cruise started 1 mile south east of Strausberg (Brandenburg, Germany) and lasted 2 minutes, covering 2 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average altitude 842 ft asl 518 ft asl min to max 929 ft asl |
882 | 518 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 87 kt 64 kt min to max 107 kt |
103 | 68 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 6.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 21.6 ° |
16.0 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.85 g min to max 1.24 g |
1.24 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.6 ° -6.3 ° min to max 3.3 ° |
-0.7 | 3.1 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:07:33 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:07:33 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:07:33 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 00:07:34 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:07:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:07:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:07:58 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 00:07:58 |
Approaching runway 23 at EDAY Strausberg Airfield from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 241 ft agl to 91 ft agl. A decrease of 151 ft in 12 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 48.48 % |
Approach angle 5.4 ° 5.2 ° min to max 5.7 ° Target 3.0 ° |
5.7 | 5.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 67 kt 66 kt min to max 68 kt |
68 | 66 kt | |
| 89.6 % |
Heading variation -0.5 ° -0.8 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.2 | -0.6 ° | |
| 78.22 % |
Average bank angle 7.1 ° 5.1 ° min to max 11.1 ° |
9.8 | 5.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.98 g 0.89 g min to max 1.10 g |
1.03 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -565 fpm -840 fpm min to max -474 fpm |
-840 | -519 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 123 ft agl 91 ft agl min to max 241 ft agl |
241 | 91 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.1 ° 0.2 ° min to max 3.3 ° |
2.5 | 0.7 ° |
Landing on runway 23 at EDAY Strausberg Airfield, runway length 1,189 m. Threshold height at 86 ft agl was significantly above target. Threshold speed was well above target at 66 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was well above target at 66 kt. Target 60 kt |
|||
| 30.89 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 0 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 95.2 % |
Heading variation 0.1 ° -0.6 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
-0.6 | 0.2 ° | |
| 83.26 % |
Average bank angle 2.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 8.4 ° |
4.9 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.90 g min to max 1.34 g |
1.02 | 1.18 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 61 kt 50 kt min to max 66 kt |
66 | 50 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -324 fpm -646 fpm min to max -42 fpm |
-525 | -53 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 20 ft agl -9 ft agl min to max 86 ft agl |
86 | -9 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -3.7 ° -10.5 ° min to max 1.5 ° |
0.6 | -9.4 ° |
Touchdown point was 95 m beyond the touchdown zone. Touchdown speed at 50 kt was good. Touchdown rate was excellent at -53 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was very good. Local weather - Temperature 12 °C. .
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Touchdown VSI was -53 fpm. |
|||
| 91.1 % |
Touchdown distance was 539 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 50 kt Target below 57 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 2.69 m 2.23 m left |
2.69 | 2.01 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.0 ° 0.4 ° min to max 1.3 ° |
0.4 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.03 g 0.94 g min to max 1.18 g |
1.18 | 0.99 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 50 kt 50 kt min to max 50 kt |
50 | 50 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -9.8 ° -10.8 ° min to max -9.3 ° |
-9.4 | -10.8 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 47 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 24 kt 21 kt min to max 26 kt |
25 | 26 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -7.3 ° -12.0 ° min to max -3.4 ° |
-11.3 | -3.6 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.9 ° 0.1 ° min to max 1.4 ° |
0.9 | 1.4 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.90 g min to max 1.44 g |
0.97 | 0.97 g |
The Cessna C172 aircraft successfully landed at EDAY Strausberg Airfield, achieving a score of 79.2%. The final approach was conducted from the north-east, heading 231.0° at an altitude of 241 feet above ground level (agl) and 0 nautical miles from the runway.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on runway 23, which has a length of 1,189 meters. However, the threshold height at 86 ft agl was significantly above the target, indicating that the aircraft may have been higher than desired at the point of touchdown. Additionally, the threshold speed was well above the target at 66 knots, suggesting that the aircraft may have been descending too quickly or that the pilot may have been unable to maintain a stable approach speed.
Despite these issues, the touchdown point was 95 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown speed of 50 knots was good, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft and make a smooth touchdown. The touchdown rate of -53 feet per minute (fpm) was also excellent, suggesting that the pilot was able to slow the aircraft down quickly and safely.
The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain a stable and aligned approach to the runway. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 12°C, which may have affected the aircraft's performance and the pilot's ability to maintain a stable approach.
Overall, while there were some issues with the approach and landing, the pilot was able to make a safe and controlled touchdown, and the aircraft was able to come to a stop without incident. However, the pilot may need to work on maintaining a more stable approach speed and ensuring that the aircraft is at the correct height and speed at the point of touchdown.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values