Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,312 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 457 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Tecnam P2006T MKII flight began with a smooth departure roll from runway 03 at LIKO Guglielmo Zamboni. The takeoff distance was 280 meters, which accounted for 41% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 68 knots.
The local weather at takeoff was favorable, with a temperature of 15 °C and a wind speed of 0 knots coming from 270 °, resulting in no crosswind or headwind components to contend with.
During the enroute climb, the aircraft started its ascent 1 mile northeast of LIKO Guglielmo Zamboni in Emilia-Romagna, Italy. The climb took the plane from 1,108 feet above sea level to 5,438 feet above sea level, an increase of 4,330 feet over 4 minutes and covering a distance of 7 nautical miles.
The subsequent level cruise segment began 1 mile southwest of LINN Aviosuperficie Molinella Molinella in Emilia-Romagna, lasting 25 minutes and covering a distance of 53 nautical miles.
The enroute descent commenced 1 mile southeast of Grisignano di Zocco in Veneto, Italy, descending from 5,715 feet above sea level to 3,004 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,712 feet over 4 minutes and covering a distance of 9 nautical miles.
Another brief level cruise segment followed, starting 1 mile south of Santa Giustina in Colle in Veneto, lasting 4 minutes and covering 6 nautical miles.
The landing took place on runway 04R at LIPZ Venice Marco Polo Airport, which has a runway length of 3,312 meters. The aircraft approached the threshold at a height of 60 feet above ground level and a speed of 73 knots. The touchdown occurred 456 meters from the threshold at a speed of 58 knots, with a vertical speed indicator reading of -89 feet per minute.
The local weather at the time of landing was similar to that of departure, with a temperature of 15 °C and a wind speed of 0 knots coming from 342 °, resulting in no crosswind or headwind components affecting the landing.
The total landing distance was 595 meters, which accounted for 18% of the runway length. The entire flight covered a distance of 93 nautical miles, took 113 minutes to complete, and consumed 54 kilograms of fuel.
Congratulations on achieving a high aircraft landing score of 98.2%! This is a remarkable achievement and reflects the skill and precision of the pilot during each phase of the landing process.
During the Approach Phase, it is commendable that the glideslope alignment was excellent. This indicates that the aircraft was on the correct descent path and approaching the runway at the correct angle, showcasing good situational awareness and decision-making.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, while the threshold height was slightly above target, the landing flare was executed well. A good landing flare helps to ensure a smooth and controlled touchdown, minimizing the impact on the aircraft and providing a comfortable experience for passengers.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is noteworthy that the touchdown rate was excellent and the speed was on target. These factors are crucial for a successful landing, as they affect the aircraft's stability and control during the crucial moment of touchdown. Additionally, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position were very good, indicating precise aiming and execution.
Finally, during the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was very good. Maintaining alignment with the runway during rollout is important for safety and efficiency, allowing for a smooth transition from landing to taxiing and ultimately stopping.
Overall, the high landing score of 98.2% reflects a thorough and well-executed landing process, with strong performance across all phases. Keep up the excellent work and continue to strive for precision and proficiency in your future landings. Your attention to detail and dedication to safe and precise landings are truly commendable.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values