Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Raise the gear lever promptly once a positive climb is confirmed, before reaching the target retraction height.
What happened: Gear retraction was delayed, with the gear not coming up until 0 ft agl.
Watch for: Landing gear: up by the normal retraction gate
Arrival
Make small rudder corrections against a fixed point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline.
What happened: You drifted off the centreline on the approach.
Watch for: Runway centreline: tracked all the way to the threshold.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 25 stages, 23 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 10.6° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: sink rate 1,548 fpm, more than the glideslope needed, centreline 3.1° off, against a 1° limit, wings 13° of bank, against a 10° limit and speed 25 kt FAST on the reference speed of 145 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,864 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,864 ft of the 10,985 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,874 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The 2.06 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from KOKC Will Rogers World Airport in Oklahoma City, the Boeing B737-800 began its takeoff roll on runway 17L, utilizing 9,445 feet of the available runway length, which accounted for 96% of the total. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 158 knots, with a local temperature of 57°F and wind conditions of 8 knots at 74°, resulting in a crosswind of 8 knots and a tailwind of 2 knots.
As the aircraft transitioned into the enroute climb phase, it began to ascend from 2,228 feet above sea level to 2,920 feet, a gain of 692 feet in less than one minute and covering a distance of less than one nautical mile. The aircraft continued to climb and level off at various altitudes, with the most significant increase occurring from 2,973 feet to 31,499 feet, a gain of 28,525 feet in 20 minutes and covering 109 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a series of level cruises, with the longest lasting 81 minutes and covering 537 nautical miles. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent from 36,766 feet to 1,414 feet, a decrease of 35,352 feet in 29 minutes and covering 135 nautical miles.
The Boeing B737-800 landed on runway 04 at KGSP Greenville Spartanburg International Airport, utilizing 5,651 feet of the available runway length, which accounted for 51% of the total. The touchdown point was 561 feet beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 156 knots. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 46 feet from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 45 feet from the centerline. The aircraft taxied to the parking area from the runway in 12 minutes, covering a distance of less than one nautical mile. The total flight distance was 898 nautical miles, and the aircraft used -3,415 pounds of fuel.
The Boeing B737-800 touched down on runway 04 at KGSP Greenville Spartanburg International Airport, marking a satisfactory conclusion to the approach. The aircraft descended from an altitude of 1,225 ft above ground level (agl) at a distance of 4 nm from the runway, heading 3.0° south. The approach quality was good, with a well-executed threshold height. However, the threshold speed of 165 kt was significantly above the target, indicating a potential for a longer landing roll.
The touchdown point was located 561 ft beyond the touchdown zone, and the aircraft touched down at a speed of 156 kt, which was slightly faster than desired. Nevertheless, the touchdown rate of -99 fpm was excellent, demonstrating a high degree of control and precision. Unfortunately, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 46 ft from the centreline, which would require correction during the rollout phase. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 73 °F and a negligible wind of 1 kt at 221°.
The total landing distance of 5,651 ft was 51% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing roll. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 45 ft from the centreline, which would require further correction to achieve a perfect landing. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 89.8%. While there were some minor deviations from the ideal, the crew demonstrated a high degree of skill and control throughout the approach and landing phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values