Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,683 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,683 m of the 2,944 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 607 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took approximately 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 08 at ESSA Stockholm-Arlanda Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,766 meters, which accounted for 71% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 166 knots.
As the aircraft climbed, it started 2 miles east of ESSA Stockholm-Arlanda Airport and reached an altitude of 9,146 meters above sea level, an increase of 8,831.3 meters from the initial altitude of 314 meters. This climb took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 76 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise began 6 miles south of Riddarhyttan and lasted for 3 minutes, covering 27 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 5 miles south east of ESVH Hällefors Airfield and lasted for 22 minutes, during which the aircraft descended from 9,145 meters to 598 meters above sea level, a decrease of 8,546.7 meters. This descent covered a distance of 106 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 19L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, was made from the north, with a heading of 196.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 390.5 meters above ground level.
The landing on runway 19L was successful, with a touchdown speed of 139 knots and a touchdown rate of -1.6 meters per second. However, the touchdown point was 188 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 27.4 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,599 meters, which accounted for 54% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 27.0 meters from the centerline.
After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking from the runway, which took approximately 6 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 215 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 51 minutes. The aircraft used 2,199 kilograms of fuel during the flight. The local temperature at the time of departure and landing was 12°C and 13°C, respectively.
The aircraft, identified as an A21N, successfully landed on runway 19L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen. The final approach was initiated from the north, heading 196.0° at an altitude of 390.5 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 140 knots.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 188 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 139 knots, which was considered good. The touchdown rate was firm at -1.6 meters per second, indicating a controlled descent. However, the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 27.4 meters from the centerline, which may have contributed to the subsequent rollout alignment issues.
The total landing distance covered by the aircraft was 1,599 meters, accounting for 54% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, considering the runway length of 2,944 meters. Nevertheless, the runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 27.0 meters from the centerline, which may have been a result of the initial touchdown position.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 13°C, which may have had some impact on the aircraft's performance. However, the exact relationship between the weather conditions and the landing performance is not specified in the report. Overall, the landing was considered satisfactory, with some minor deviations from the ideal touchdown and rollout positions.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values