Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5.6 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,666 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,666 m of the 3,986 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 562 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A321 taking off from runway 24 at Václav Havel Airport Prague, LKPR. The aircraft took 10 minutes to taxi to the runway, covering a distance of 3 nautical miles. The takeoff roll started at 24, and the aircraft lifted off at a speed of 156 knots, with a takeoff distance of 1,165 meters, which accounted for 31% of the runway. The local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 5°C, with a wind speed of 8 knots at 159°.
As the aircraft ascended, it began its enroute climb over Dobroviz, in the Stredocesky kraj region of the Czech Republic. Climbing from an altitude of 2,229 feet above sea level to 23,300 feet, the aircraft increased its altitude by 21,070 feet in 9 minutes, covering a distance of 49 nautical miles. The enroute climb was followed by a level cruise, which started 1 mile south east of Vreskovice in the Plzensky kraj region of the Czech Republic. The cruise lasted for 5 minutes, covering a distance of 33 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began its descent from 23,298 feet above sea level to 16,483 feet above sea level, a decrease of 6,816 feet in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 21 nautical miles. The descent started 2 miles north west of Achslach in Bavaria, Germany. The aircraft then began another climb, this time from 16,473 feet above sea level to 17,386 feet above sea level, an increase of 913 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 10 nautical miles. This climb started 1 mile south east of Pilsting in Bavaria, Germany.
The aircraft then began its final descent from 17,389 feet above sea level to 3,837 feet above sea level, a decrease of 13,553 feet in 7 minutes, covering a distance of 37 nautical miles. This descent started overhead Loiching in Bavaria, Germany. The aircraft then began a final level cruise, which started overhead Hohenkammer in Bavaria, Germany. The cruise lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nautical miles.
As the aircraft prepared for landing, it began its final approach to runway 08L at EDDM Munich Airport from the west, heading 83.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,277 feet above ground level. The landing was carried out on a runway length of 3,986 meters. The threshold height at 58 feet above ground level was slightly above the target, and the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 137 knots. The touchdown point was 151 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 129 knots, which was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was firm at -308 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at EDDM Munich Airport were characterized by a temperature of 0°C, with a wind speed of 3 knots at 168°. The crosswind was 3 knots, and the headwind was 0 knots. The total landing distance was 1,590 meters, which accounted for 40% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.6 meters from the centerline. After landing, the aircraft took 5 minutes to taxi to the parking from the runway, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
In total, the flight covered a distance of 167 nautical miles, took 40 minutes, and used 2,054 kilograms of fuel..
The Airbus A321 aircraft successfully landed on runway 08L at EDDM Munich Airport, achieving a score of 93.1%. The final approach was initiated from the west, heading 83.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,277 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, with the touchdown point located 151 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone.
The touchdown speed of 129 knots was slightly above the target speed, indicating that the aircraft may have been slightly fast during the landing. However, the touchdown rate of -308 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, suggesting that the aircraft maintained a stable descent during the landing. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway during the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 0°C and a wind speed of 3 knots from a direction of 168°. The crosswind component was 3 knots, while the headwind component was negligible. These conditions did not appear to have a significant impact on the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,590 meters was 40% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.6 meters from the centerline, suggesting that the aircraft may have deviated slightly from the intended path during the rollout.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score despite some minor deviations from the target parameters. The pilots demonstrated good control and management of the aircraft during the landing, and the aircraft performed well in the given weather conditions.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values