Track every flight, analyse your performance,
and master your flying skills with My FS Flights
Get 10 flights free every month!
Tracked and analysed flights over miles
This flight involved an Airbus H160 aircraft that began its enroute climb from a location overhead EGVO RAF Odiham in Hampshire, England. The aircraft started its ascent from an altitude of 661 feet above sea level and quickly rose to 470 feet above sea level, an increase of 191 feet in less than a minute, while covering a distance of less than a nautical mile.
As the aircraft approached the runway, it was heading east towards runway 27 at EGVO RAF Odiham, which has a length of 1,820 meters. The aircraft was at an altitude of 68 feet above ground level and had traveled a distance of 0 nautical miles when it began its final approach. However, the threshold height was significantly above the target, and the threshold speed was excessively high at 126 knots.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down at a point that was excessively long, using more than 75% of the available runway. The touchdown speed was also too fast at 33 knots, but the touchdown rate was excellent at -60 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating a smooth and controlled landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the flight were characterized by a temperature of 4 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 5 knots from a direction of 202 degrees. The crosswind was 4 knots, and the headwind was 2 knots. These conditions did not appear to have a significant impact on the flight.
After landing, the aircraft took 59 minutes to taxi to the parking area, covering a distance of less than a nautical mile. The total flight distance was 7 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 26 minutes. The aircraft used 69 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Departure climb to 50 ft agl from runway 24 EGLF Farnborough Airport.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.5 ° 0.2 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.2 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 43 kn 17 kn min to max 58 kn |
17 | 58 kn | |
| 80.74 % |
Average bank angle 2.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 9.3 ° |
9.3 | 2.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.91 g min to max 1.12 g |
1.04 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 220 fpm 103 fpm min to max 383 fpm |
383 | 267 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 39 ft agl -2 ft agl min to max 65 ft agl |
-2 | 65 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -4.5 ° -9.7 ° min to max -3.0 ° |
-4.6 | -3.4 ° | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 18:20:02 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 18:20:02 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 2 Started at 18:20:02 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 18:20:02 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 18:20:02 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 18:20:02 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 18:20:02 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 18:20:02 |
Departure climb to 400 ft agl from 24 EGLF Farnborough Airport.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 98.5 % |
Heading variation -0.5 ° -2.1 ° min to max 0.4 ° |
0.4 | -2.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 83 kn 58 kn min to max 124 kn |
58 | 124 kn | |
| 91.58 % |
Average bank angle 1.7 ° 0.0 ° min to max 5.2 ° |
2.9 | 5.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.91 g min to max 1.14 g |
0.99 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 257 fpm -121 fpm min to max 822 fpm |
266 | 258 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 185 ft agl 65 ft agl min to max 525 ft agl |
65 | 525 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -2.3 ° -4.4 ° min to max 1.0 ° |
-3.4 | -1.1 ° |
Departure climb to 1,000 ft agl from 24 EGLF Farnborough Airport.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.3 ° -2.4 ° min to max 2.4 ° |
-2.4 | 2.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 131 kn 124 kn min to max 139 kn |
124 | 126 kn | |
| 58.24 % |
Average bank angle 4.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 17.9 ° |
5.2 | 17.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.84 g min to max 1.14 g |
1.00 | 1.05 g | |
| 0 % |
Landing gear up |
|||
| Info |
Average VSI -42 fpm -798 fpm min to max 968 fpm |
258 | -798 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 501 ft agl 426 ft agl min to max 569 ft agl |
530 | 441 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.1 ° -3.3 ° min to max 4.8 ° |
-1.1 | -3.0 ° | |
| Info |
Gear Not Retracted at 18:21:54 |
Enroute climb started overhead EGVO RAF Odiham Odiham (Hampshire, England). Climbing from 661 ft asl to 470 ft asl, an increase of 191 ft in less than 1 minute. and covering less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 128 kn 126 kn min to max 128 kn |
126 | 128 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 11.1 ° 1.2 ° min to max 17.9 ° |
17.8 | 3.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.04 g 0.97 g min to max 1.10 g |
0.97 | 1.07 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -1,116 fpm -1,299 fpm min to max -850 fpm |
-850 | -872 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 562 ft asl 470 ft asl min to max 661 ft asl |
661 | 470 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.3 ° -2.8 ° min to max 1.8 ° |
-2.8 | 1.8 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 |
Approaching runway 27 at EGVO RAF Odiham from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 68 ft agl to 50 ft agl. A decrease of 18 ft in 1 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 92.03 % |
Approach angle 5.4 ° 5.0 ° min to max 6.0 ° Target 3.0 ° |
5.0 | 6.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 127 kn 126 kn min to max 128 kn |
128 | 126 kn | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.2 ° -0.3 ° min to max -0.1 ° |
-0.1 | -0.3 ° | |
| 76.92 % |
Average bank angle 9.9 ° 7.2 ° min to max 12.0 ° |
7.2 | 12.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.05 g 1.03 g min to max 1.07 g |
1.07 | 1.03 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -643 fpm -742 fpm min to max -556 fpm |
-742 | -556 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 59 ft agl 50 ft agl min to max 68 ft agl |
68 | 50 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 2.8 ° 2.4 ° min to max 3.0 ° |
2.4 | 3.0 ° |
Landing on runway 27 at EGVO RAF Odiham, runway length 1,820 m. Threshold height at 87 ft agl was significantly above target. Threshold speed was excessively high at 126 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 0 % |
Threshold speed was excessively high at 126 kn. Target 54 kn |
|||
| 27.84 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 0 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 85.2 % |
Heading variation -0.5 ° -0.9 ° min to max -0.3 ° |
-0.4 | -0.6 ° | |
| 74.86 % |
Average bank angle 3.0 ° 0.0 ° min to max 12.0 ° |
12.0 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.94 g min to max 1.15 g |
1.00 | 0.97 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 88 kn 33 kn min to max 126 kn |
126 | 33 kn | |
| Info |
Average VSI -152 fpm -628 fpm min to max 131 fpm |
-514 | -60 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 31 ft agl -1 ft agl min to max 87 ft agl |
87 | -1 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 8.4 ° 1.7 ° min to max 14.4 ° |
2.8 | 10.0 ° |
Touchdown point was excessively long using more than 75% of available runway. Touchdown speed at 33 kn was too fast. Touchdown rate was excellent at -60 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was very good. Local weather - Temperature 4 °C. Wind 5 kn at 202 °. Crosswind: 4 kn Headwind: 2 kn.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Touchdown VSI was -60 fpm. |
|||
| 0 % |
Touchdown distance was 1,515 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 79.27 % |
Speed at touchdown 33 kn Target 26 kn |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 2.58 m 2.49 m right |
-2.58 | -2.37 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.4 | 0.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.05 g 0.97 g min to max 1.11 g |
0.97 | 1.06 g | |
| 80 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 32 kn 31 kn min to max 33 kn |
33 | 31 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 9.4 ° 9.1 ° min to max 10.0 ° |
10.0 | 9.4 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 22 kn
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 16 kn 10 kn min to max 19 kn |
19 | 10 kn | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.2 ° -0.5 ° min to max 9.6 ° |
9.4 | -0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.6 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.0 ° |
0.1 | 0.6 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.98 g min to max 1.04 g |
1.04 | 1.00 g |
Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 59 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 0 % |
Average speed 11 kn 0 kn min to max 47 kn |
10 | 0 kn | |
| 75 % |
Average speed turning corners 16 kn max 19 kn |
0 | 0 kn | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.83 g min to max 1.28 g |
1.00 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.7 ° -3.1 ° min to max 9.2 ° |
-0.1 | -0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 2.0 ° 0.0 ° min to max 16.6 ° |
0.6 | 0.4 ° | |
| 1 % |
Landing Lights at 18:32:55 |
The Airbus H160 aircraft has successfully landed at RAF Odiham, but the landing was not without its issues. The final approach to runway 27 was initiated from the east, heading 278.0° at an altitude of 68 feet above ground level (agl) and 0 nautical miles from the runway. The aircraft's approach was marked by a number of deviations from the ideal landing parameters.
One of the primary concerns was the threshold height, which was significantly above the target height of 87 feet agl. This indicates that the aircraft was not properly configured for landing, potentially leading to a higher-than-desired touchdown point. Furthermore, the threshold speed was excessively high at 126 knots, which is above the recommended speed for landing. This could have resulted in a longer-than-desired rollout and increased the risk of overrunning the runway.
The touchdown point was also a concern, as it was excessively long, using more than 75% of the available runway. This suggests that the aircraft was not properly aligned with the runway or that the pilot was not able to slow the aircraft down sufficiently before touchdown. Additionally, the touchdown speed of 33 knots was too fast, which could have resulted in a longer-than-desired rollout and increased the risk of overrunning the runway.
On the positive side, the touchdown rate was excellent at -60 feet per minute (fpm), indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down smoothly and without excessive deceleration. The runway touchdown alignment was also very good, suggesting that the pilot was able to maintain a stable and aligned approach to the runway.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 4°C and a wind speed of 5 knots from 202°. The crosswind component was 4 knots, while the headwind component was 2 knots. These conditions were not particularly challenging, and the pilot should have been able to maintain a stable and controlled approach to the runway.
Overall, while the Airbus H160 aircraft was able to land safely at RAF Odiham, the landing was marked by a number of deviations from the ideal landing parameters. The pilot should review the flight data to identify the causes of these deviations and take corrective action to improve the landing performance in the future.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values
