Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,680 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,680 m of the 3,527 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 331 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 16 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 22R at EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,330 meters, which accounted for 44% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 164 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 5 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 15 knots from a direction of 230 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 15 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile west of EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport and reaching a height of 34,535 feet above sea level. This climb, which covered a distance of 102 nautical miles, took 18 minutes and involved an increase in altitude of 33,377 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 37 miles southwest of Hanko, Finland. This phase lasted for 84 minutes and covered a distance of 565 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 7 miles northeast of Wangerooge, Germany. This descent, which covered a distance of 148 nautical miles, took 28 minutes and involved a decrease in altitude of 34,446 feet.
The final approach to runway 18R at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was made from the north, with the aircraft heading 183.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,276 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 18R was successful, with the touchdown distance being 331 meters and the touchdown speed being 144 knots. However, the touchdown speed was slightly above the target speed, and the touchdown rate was firm at -386 feet per minute.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 8 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 10 knots from a direction of 210 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 9 knots. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 11.2 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.9 meters from the centerline.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 826 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 158 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 5,708 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, with a score of 93.2%. The final approach to runway 18R was initiated from the north, heading 183.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,276 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating a stable and controlled descent.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 145 knots, which may have been due to various factors such as wind conditions or pilot adjustments. The touchdown distance of 331 meters was considered good, indicating a smooth and controlled landing. However, the touchdown speed of 144 knots was a little fast, which may have resulted in a slightly firmer touchdown rate.
The touchdown rate of -386 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, indicating a relatively steep descent rate. This may have been due to the aircraft's speed and altitude at the time of touchdown. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 11.2 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to pilot error or wind conditions.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 8°C and a wind speed of 10 knots from 210°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the headwind component was 9 knots. These wind conditions may have affected the aircraft's approach and landing.
The total landing distance of 1,601 meters was 45% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.9 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to pilot error or wind conditions. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with a score of 93.2%, indicating a high level of proficiency and control.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values