Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 16 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 5,632 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,481 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, landing an aircraft is a challenging task that requires precise execution at each phase of the process. While your aircraft landing score of 84.3% shows room for improvement, there are notable strengths and areas of improvement to focus on.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is important to maintain a descent path within the glideslope limit to ensure a smooth transition into the Landing Phase. By addressing the issue of being above the glideslope limit, you can improve the overall approach and set yourself up for a successful landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is encouraging to see that the touchdown rate was good and the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone. However, there is room for improvement in the threshold height being above target and the landing flare being very poor. By working on these aspects, you can achieve a more controlled and precise landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is great to see that the touchdown rate and speed were close to target. Additionally, the touchdown distance and runway touchdown position were very good, indicating a strong foundation for improvement in this phase.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being slightly off the centerline can be improved with practice and attention to detail. By focusing on maintaining proper alignment during the rollout, you can enhance the overall landing performance.
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 84.3% is a commendable starting point, with clear strengths in areas such as touchdown rate and touchdown distance. By addressing the areas for improvement, such as descent path, threshold height, landing flair, and runway alignment, you can continue to refine your skills and strive for even better results in future landings. Remember, practice and perseverance are key to mastering the art of aircraft landing. Keep up the good work and keep striving for excellence in each phase of the landing process. You have the potential to achieve even greater success with dedication and continued effort. Good luck!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values