Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 12 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Begin raising the nose earlier, by 11 ft, so the flare has time to arrest the sink before touchdown.
What happened: The flare began late at 0.3 ft, 11 ft below the normal band, and a late flare like this usually leaves too little time to arrest the sink before touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and start the flare in the normal band, around 11 ft.
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,441 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 284 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 22R at EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport. The Airbus A319 took off with a takeoff distance of 1,117 meters, which was 37% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 147 knots. At the time of departure, the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 22 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 26 knots from a direction of 270 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 20 knots and a headwind of 17 knots.
As the aircraft climbed, it started its enroute climb 2 miles south of Tarnby, a town in Region Hovedstaden, Denmark. The climb began at an altitude of 1,015 feet above sea level and reached a maximum altitude of 8,948 feet above sea level, an increase of 7,933 feet in just 4 minutes. During this climb, the aircraft covered a distance of 11 nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started overhead Taastrup, another town in Region Hovedstaden, Denmark. This cruise phase lasted for 9 minutes and covered a distance of 38 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began another climb phase, this time starting 3 miles northeast of EK64 Hesselø Airstrip in Region Hovedstaden, Denmark. The climb began at an altitude of 8,901 feet above sea level and reached a maximum altitude of 35,707 feet above sea level, an increase of 26,806 feet in 16 minutes. During this climb, the aircraft covered a distance of 100 nautical miles.
After the second climb phase, the aircraft entered another level cruise phase, which started 8 miles west of EKVC Vra Airport Vra in the North Denmark Region, Denmark. This cruise phase lasted for 16 minutes and covered a distance of 115 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent phase, starting 5 miles northeast of Tonstad in Agder, Norway. The descent began at an altitude of 35,532 feet above sea level and reached a maximum altitude of 1,432 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,100 feet in 26 minutes. During this descent, the aircraft covered a distance of 103 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 35 at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland was made from the south, with a heading of 351.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,265 feet above ground level.
The aircraft landed on runway 35 at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland, which had a length of 2,441 meters. The landing was characterized by a good threshold height, a threshold speed of 131 knots, and a touchdown distance of 284 meters. However, the touchdown speed of 131 knots was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was hard at -430 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area from the runway, taking 2 minutes and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 373 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 76 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 3,223 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A319 successfully landed at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland, with a score of 95.6%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 351.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,265 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with good control, and the aircraft landed safely on runway 35, which has a length of 2,441 meters.
The threshold height was satisfactory, and the threshold speed was maintained at 131 knots, which is a good speed for landing. However, the touchdown speed was slightly higher than ideal at 131 knots, resulting in a hard touchdown rate of -430 feet per minute (fpm). Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained control and alignment during the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were moderate, with a temperature of 14°C and a wind speed of 11 knots from 310°. The crosswind component was 7 knots, while the headwind component was 9 knots. These conditions did not significantly impact the landing, and the aircraft was able to maintain a stable approach.
The total landing distance was 1,053 meters, which is 43% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot executed a good flare and touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, suggesting that the pilot maintained control and alignment during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated good control and technique throughout the approach and landing phases. However, there is room for improvement in terms of touchdown speed and rate to achieve a smoother landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values