Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Monitor your taxi speed
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 22 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,950 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 197 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First and foremost, let's start by acknowledging the overall impressive landing score of 94.1%! This is a great achievement and clearly demonstrates the skill and precision of the pilot during the landing phase.
Looking at the individual components of the landing, we can see that the approach phase had a descent path below the glideslope limit. While this is a minor deviation, it's important to ensure that the descent path remains within the glideslope limit in order to maintain a safe and controlled approach.
Moving on to the landing phase, we can see that there were several positive aspects. The threshold height was good, indicating a well-timed approach to the runway. Additionally, the landing flare was executed perfectly, showcasing a smooth transition from descent to touchdown.
In the touchdown phase, there were a few areas for improvement. The touchdown rate was noted as hard, which could potentially be addressed by adjusting the approach speed or angle of descent. The speed being slightly above target also suggests that a minor adjustment may be needed to achieve a more optimal landing speed.
Despite these minor areas for improvement, it's worth noting that the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone, indicating a safe and controlled touchdown within the designated area of the runway. The runway touchdown position being 11.4 m from the centerline is also within an acceptable range, demonstrating good alignment with the runway.
Finally, in the rollout phase, the runway alignment was slightly off at 10.1 m from the centerline. While alignment is a critical aspect of a successful landing, this deviation is relatively minor and can be easily corrected with practice and focus on maintaining centerline alignment during rollout.
Overall, this landing score of 94.1% is a testament to the pilot's skill and expertise in executing a safe and controlled landing. By addressing the minor areas for improvement highlighted in the analysis, there is great potential for even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the great work and continue to strive for excellence in every aspect of your flying!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values