Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Monitor your taxi speed
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,447 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 542 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A320, then departed from runway 25C at Frankfurt Airport (EDDF). The takeoff distance was 1,377 meters, which is 35% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 168 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 8°C and winds of 7 knots at 201 degrees. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the headwind component was also 5 knots. After departing from Frankfurt, the aircraft began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile south of Kelsterbach, Hessen, Germany. The climb took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 125 nautical miles, with the aircraft ascending from 1,395 feet above sea level to 30,588 feet above sea level, an increase of 29,193 feet.
The enroute level cruise started 2 miles northeast of Loffingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, and lasted for 4 minutes, covering a distance of 81 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting overhead Airolo, Ticino, Switzerland. The descent took 19 minutes and covered a distance of 75 nautical miles, with the aircraft descending from 30,473 feet above sea level to 1,619 feet above sea level, a decrease of 28,855 feet.
The final approach to runway 36 at Milano Linate Airport (LIML) was made from the south, heading 356.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,249 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with the touchdown point being 116 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 128 knots, which was good, and the touchdown rate was also good at -190 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was also perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 13°C and winds of 13 knots at 360 degrees. The crosswind component was 1 knot, while the headwind component was 13 knots. The total landing distance was 1,215 meters, which is 50% of the runway length. The aircraft then taxied to the parking from the runway, which took 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 290 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 48 minutes. The aircraft used 546 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Milano Linate Airport, achieving a high score of 98.9%. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the south, heading 356.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,249 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot executed a precise final approach, taking into account the local weather conditions.
The temperature at the time of landing was 13°C, with a wind speed of 13 knots coming from a direction of 360°. This resulted in a negligible crosswind component of 1 knot, while the aircraft experienced a significant headwind of 13 knots. Despite these conditions, the pilot maintained excellent control of the aircraft, ensuring a smooth and stable descent.
Upon reaching the runway, the pilot touched down at a speed of 128 knots, which was within the acceptable threshold speed of 136 knots. The touchdown point was located 116 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, but this was still considered a good result given the circumstances. The aircraft's rate of descent at touchdown was also satisfactory, at -190 feet per minute.
The total landing distance covered by the aircraft was 1,215 meters, which accounted for approximately 50% of the runway length. This was a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot had successfully managed the aircraft's speed and descent rate to achieve a smooth touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating the pilot's skill and control during the landing phase.
Overall, the landing was executed with precision and skill, taking into account the local weather conditions and the aircraft's performance characteristics. The high score achieved by the pilot reflects their expertise and ability to handle challenging situations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values