Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,528 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 248 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at EDLW Dortmund Airport, taking 7 minutes and covering a distance of 3 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 24, with a takeoff distance of 678 meters, which was 49% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 140 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 21°C temperature and a wind speed of 3 knots at 224°. The crosswind was 1 knot, and the headwind was 3 knots. The enroute climb started overhead EDLW Dortmund Airport, where the aircraft climbed from 1,516 feet above sea level to 23,950 feet above sea level, an increase of 22,434 feet in 7 minutes and covering a distance of 3 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started overhead EDIU Hengsen-Opherdicke Airfield, lasting 26 minutes and covering a distance of 165 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent from 24,000 feet above sea level to 3,603 feet above sea level, a decrease of 20,397 feet in 16 minutes and covering a distance of 93 nautical miles. The descent started 1 mile west of Haegen, France.
The enroute level cruise started again overhead LSZG Grenchen Airfield, lasting only 2 minutes and covering a distance of 5 nautical miles. The aircraft then began a short climb from 3,311 feet above sea level to 3,302 feet above sea level, an increase of 9 feet in 2 minutes and covering a distance of 7 nautical miles. This climb started overhead Wengi, Switzerland.
The final approach to runway 14 at LSZB Bern Airport was made from the northwest, heading 141.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,607 feet above ground level. The landing took place on runway 14, which had a length of 1,528 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was well above the target at 135 knots.
The touchdown distance was good at 246 meters, and the touchdown speed was 132 knots, which was fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -258 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 17°C temperature and a wind speed of 3 knots at 224°, with a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 0 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,142 meters, which was 75% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took less than 1 minute and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 282 nautical miles, taking 59 minutes and using 2,941 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at LSZB Bern Airport, achieving a score of 96.6%. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the north-west, heading 141.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,607 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed safely on runway 14, which has a length of 1,528 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it approached the runway. However, the threshold speed was above the target speed, coming in at 135 knots. This may have been due to the aircraft's descent rate or the pilot's decision to maintain a higher speed for a smoother landing.
The touchdown distance was good, measuring 246 meters, which is within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown speed was slightly fast at 132 knots, which may have resulted in a higher touchdown rate. The touchdown rate of -258 feet per minute (fpm) was fair, indicating that the aircraft touched down with a moderate amount of force.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the centerline of the runway as it touched down. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 17°C and a light wind of 3 knots from 224°. The crosswind component was minimal at 3 knots, and there was no headwind component.
The total landing distance was 1,142 meters, which is 75% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop quickly after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the centerline of the runway as it rolled out after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft was able to stop safely within the designated runway area. However, there were some minor issues with the touchdown speed and rate, which may have been due to the pilot's decision-making or the aircraft's performance characteristics.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values