Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,742 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 315 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 08 at PLCH Cassidy International Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,219 meters, which was 58% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 135 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 32 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 10 knots at a direction of 110 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 9 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile east of PLCH Cassidy International Airport, and climbed from an altitude of 1,010 feet above sea level to 30,584 feet above sea level, an increase of 29,574 feet, in 29 minutes and covering 172 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise phase of the flight started at a latitude of 4.8692418 and a longitude of -157.2564256, and lasted for 36 minutes, covering 927 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 28 miles south of PHNY Lanai Airport, and descended from 30,791 feet above sea level to 1,261 feet above sea level, a decrease of 29,530 feet, in 16 minutes and covering 83 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 04R at PHNL Daniel K Inouye International Airport was made from the southwest, heading 54.0 degrees, at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,249 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 04R was successful, with a touchdown distance of 313 meters, which was 25% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was 104 knots, and the touchdown rate was fair at -231 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.2 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 29 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 16 knots at a direction of 60 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 16 knots. The total landing distance was 687 meters, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 7 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,190 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 96 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 7,190 kilograms.
The aircraft in question, an RJ85, successfully landed at PHNL Daniel K Inouye International Airport, achieving a high score of 99.7%. The final approach was conducted from the southwest, heading 54.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,249 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing on runway 04R, the aircraft demonstrated good performance, with a threshold height that was satisfactory and a threshold speed of 111 knots, which was also within acceptable limits. The touchdown distance of 313 meters was also good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The touchdown speed of 104 knots was within the desired range, further emphasizing the pilot's skill in executing a safe landing.
However, there were a few areas where the landing could be improved. The touchdown rate of -231 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, suggesting that the pilot could have maintained a more gradual descent to reduce the impact on the aircraft. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.2 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 29°C and a wind speed of 16 knots at 60°. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 16 knots, which the pilot effectively managed to counteract during the landing. The total landing distance of 687 meters was only 25% of the runway length, indicating a short and controlled rollout. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, demonstrating the pilot's skill in maintaining control of the aircraft during the critical phase of the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values