Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
See Arrival Final 3
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the runway's 5° glideslope and off the centreline.
At the 500 ft gate: off the runway's 5° glideslope.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,228 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,228 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 117 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took approximately 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 07 at EDDS Stuttgart Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,134 meters, which accounted for 37% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 151 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 2 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 6 knots at a direction of 110 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 4 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb 1 mile west of Neuhausen auf den Fildern, a town in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. The climb started from an altitude of 2,307 feet above sea level and reached a maximum altitude of 25,842 feet above sea level, an increase of 23,535 feet in 12 minutes, covering a distance of 65 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 1 mile northwest of Ehingen, a town in the state of Bavaria, Germany. This phase of the flight lasted for 16 minutes and covered a distance of 125 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent 1 mile east of Rodengo, a town in the province of Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy. The descent began from an altitude of 25,848 feet above sea level and ended at an altitude of 2,572 feet above sea level, a decrease of 23,275 feet in 18 minutes, covering a distance of 89 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 01 at LIPB Bolzano Airport was made from the south, with a heading of 22.0 degrees at a distance of 3 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,762 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 01, which had a length of 1,228 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 146 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 117 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 144 knots. The touchdown rate was very hard at -572 feet per minute, but the runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 0 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 1 knot at a direction of 251 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 0 knots. The total landing distance was 1,159 meters, which accounted for 94% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took approximately 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 284 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 54 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 2,584 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at LIPB Bolzano Airport, achieving a score of 87.0%. The final approach to runway 01 was conducted from the south, with a heading of 22.0° at a distance of 3 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,762 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The threshold speed of 146 knots was also satisfactory, suggesting that the pilot had maintained a stable approach speed. However, the touchdown speed of 144 knots was slightly faster than ideal, which may have contributed to a harder-than-ideal touchdown.
The touchdown rate of -572 feet per minute (fpm) was very hard, indicating that the aircraft may have experienced a significant deceleration upon touchdown. This could be attributed to the slightly fast touchdown speed. Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot had maintained a stable and aligned approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 0°C and a wind speed of 1 knot from 251°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind component was negligible at 0 knots. These conditions were favorable for the landing, allowing the pilot to maintain a stable approach.
The total landing distance of 1,159 meters was 94% of the available runway length, indicating that the pilot had maintained a controlled and stable approach. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, suggesting that the pilot had maintained a stable and aligned rollout after touchdown.
Overall, while the landing was not perfect, with a slightly fast touchdown speed and a hard touchdown rate, the pilot demonstrated good control and stability throughout the approach and landing. The favorable weather conditions and the aircraft's performance contributed to a successful landing, despite some minor issues.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values