Track every flight, analyse your performance,
and master your flying skills with My FS Flights
Get 10 flights free every month!
Tracked and analysed flights over miles
The flight began with an enroute climb from Holme in Cambridgeshire, England, where the aircraft lifted off from a height of 42 feet above sea level. It rapidly ascended to a height of 933 feet above sea level, an increase of 891 feet in just one minute, while covering a distance of two nautical miles.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered an enroute level cruise phase, which started overhead Stilton in Cambridgeshire, England. During this three-minute period, the aircraft maintained a steady altitude and covered a distance of five nautical miles.
As the flight progressed, the aircraft began its enroute descent from a height of 1,083 feet above sea level to 243 feet above sea level, a decrease of 840 feet in three minutes, while covering a distance of one nautical mile. This descent phase started overhead Peterborough/Sibson Airfield in Cambridgeshire, England.
The final approach to runway 06 at Peterborough/Sibson Airfield was initiated from the south-west, with the aircraft heading at 60.0 degrees at a distance of one nautical mile and an altitude of 134 feet above ground level. The landing was executed successfully, with the aircraft touching down on the runway at a speed of 37 knots and a distance of 48 meters.
The landing distance of 282 meters was 118% of the runway length, which was 239 meters. The touchdown speed and rate were both excellent, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 15 degrees Celsius, a wind speed of 2 knots from 270 degrees, and a crosswind of 1 knot and a tailwind of 2 knots.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area from the runway in just one minute, covering a distance of less than one nautical mile. The total flight distance was eight nautical miles, and the flight duration was nine minutes, with no fuel being consumed during the flight.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started overhead Holme (Cambridgeshire, England). Climbing from 42 ft asl to 933 ft asl, an increase of 891 ft in 1 minutes and covering 2 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 81 kt 66 kt min to max 100 kt |
66 | 93 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 2.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 6.9 ° |
1.4 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.87 g min to max 1.13 g |
1.01 | 0.94 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 607 fpm -238 fpm min to max 1,266 fpm |
309 | 5 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 342 ft asl 42 ft asl min to max 935 ft asl |
42 | 933 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 5.5 ° -1.0 ° min to max 9.3 ° |
4.9 | 0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 19:40:21 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 19:40:21 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 19:40:21 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 19:40:21 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 19:40:21 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 19:40:21 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 19:40:21 |
Enroute level cruise started overhead Stilton (Cambridgeshire, England) and lasted 3 minutes, covering 5 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average altitude 877 ft asl 695 ft asl min to max 1,085 ft asl |
930 | 1,084 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 92 kt 75 kt min to max 99 kt |
93 | 87 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 4.4 ° |
0.3 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.89 g min to max 1.16 g |
0.95 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.9 ° -2.5 ° min to max 8.4 ° |
-0.6 | 0.5 ° |
Enroute descent started overhead EGSP Peterborough/Sibson Airfield Peterborough (Cambridgeshire, England). Descent from 1,083 ft asl to 243 ft asl, a decrease of 840 ft in 3 minutes and covering 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 70 kt 51 kt min to max 88 kt |
87 | 60 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 5.0 ° 0.0 ° min to max 13.4 ° |
0.2 | 1.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.93 g min to max 1.12 g |
0.99 | 0.96 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -302 fpm -1,016 fpm min to max 315 fpm |
-52 | -198 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 659 ft asl 243 ft asl min to max 1,112 ft asl |
1,083 | 243 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.3 ° -6.6 ° min to max 3.3 ° |
0.4 | -1.5 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 19:46:25 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 19:46:27 |
Approaching runway 06 at EGSP Peterborough/Sibson Airfield from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 134 ft agl to 20 ft agl. A decrease of 114 ft in 33 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 0.9 ° 0.4 ° min to max 1.7 ° Target 3.0 ° |
1.7 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 47 kt 38 kt min to max 59 kt |
59 | 38 kt | |
| 51.6 % |
Heading variation -1.3 ° -1.7 ° min to max -0.6 ° |
-1.4 | -0.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.5 ° |
0.6 | 0.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.98 g min to max 1.03 g |
0.98 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -195 fpm -319 fpm min to max -25 fpm |
-221 | -38 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 53 ft agl 20 ft agl min to max 134 ft agl |
134 | 20 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.6 ° -1.9 ° min to max 4.1 ° |
-1.6 | 3.9 ° |
Landing on runway 06 at EGSP Peterborough/Sibson Airfield, runway length 239 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed at 38 kt was well below target, take care not to stall.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 71.86 % |
Threshold speed at 38 kt was well below target, take care not to stall. Target 55 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 13 ft agl |
|||
| 100 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 96 % |
Heading variation -0.6 ° -0.6 ° min to max -0.5 ° |
-0.6 | -0.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.8 ° |
0.7 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.99 g min to max 1.01 g |
0.99 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 37 kt 37 kt min to max 38 kt |
38 | 37 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -50 fpm -59 fpm min to max -39 fpm |
-39 | -59 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 2 ft agl 1 ft agl min to max 3 ft agl |
3 | 1 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.2 ° 3.9 ° min to max 4.6 ° |
3.9 | 4.6 ° |
Touchdown distance was good at 48 m. Touchdown speed at 37 kt was good. Touchdown rate was excellent at -59 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was very good. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 2 kt at 270 °. Crosswind: 1 kt Tailwind: 2 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Touchdown VSI was -59 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 48 m Target 232 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 37 kt Target below 54 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 1.76 m 1.28 m right |
-1.76 | -0.70 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.2 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.95 g min to max 1.07 g |
1.01 | 0.99 g | |
| 0 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 35 kt 34 kt min to max 37 kt |
37 | 34 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.0 ° 2.8 ° min to max 5.3 ° |
4.6 | 3.1 ° |
Total landing distance 282 m, 118 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was perfect.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 0 % |
Landing distance 282 m 118 % of runway. |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 2.93 m 2.27 m left to 0.66 m right |
-0.66 | 0.81 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.94 g min to max 1.07 g |
0.99 | 1.07 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 39 kt 31 kt min to max 41 kt |
41 | 31 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.3 ° -0.7 ° min to max 3.1 ° |
3.1 | 0.4 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.7 ° |
0.3 | 0.4 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 10 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 16 kt 0 kt min to max 29 kt |
29 | 0 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.5 ° -1.2 ° min to max -0.1 ° |
-0.4 | -0.4 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.7 ° |
0.7 | 0.4 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.97 g min to max 1.04 g |
0.98 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 19:49:33 |
Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 1 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 60.5 % |
Average speed 14 kt 7 kt min to max 38 kt |
19 | 38 kt | |
| 70 % |
Average speed turning corners 12 kt max 19 kt |
0 | 0 kt | |
| 98 % |
Average g force 1.07 g 0.43 g min to max 1.41 g |
1.09 | 0.46 g | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.2 ° -1.0 ° min to max 0.7 ° |
0.0 | 0.7 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.3 | 0.1 ° | |
| 1 % |
Landing Lights at 19:49:41 |
The aircraft, identified as Sirius, successfully landed at EGSP Peterborough/Sibson Airfield, achieving an overall score of 80.7%. The final approach to runway 06 was conducted from the south west, with a heading of 60.0° at 1 nautical mile and 134 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot demonstrated good control and precision during the approach, ultimately landing safely on the runway.
The landing was executed with a threshold speed of 38 knots, which was well below the target speed, indicating a cautious approach to avoid stalling the aircraft. The touchdown distance of 48 meters was considered good, and the touchdown speed of 37 knots was also within acceptable limits. The most impressive aspect of the landing was the touchdown rate, which was an excellent -59 feet per minute (fpm), demonstrating a smooth and controlled descent.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 15°C and a gentle wind of 2 knots from 270°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, and the tailwind component was 2 knots, which did not significantly impact the landing. The total landing distance of 282 meters was 118% of the runway length, indicating a slightly longer than expected rollout, but the runway rollout alignment was perfect, suggesting that the pilot maintained control and precision throughout the landing.
Overall, the landing was considered safe and successful, with the pilot demonstrating good control and precision throughout the approach and landing phases. However, the slightly longer than expected rollout distance may indicate a need for further refinement in the pilot's landing technique.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values
