Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Roll the wings level with aileron and hold bank within limits as you establish the climb.
What happened: Bank increased to 3° during the initial climb, and wings stayed over-banked at 7.1° into the next climb segment.
Watch for: Attitude indicator bank angle, aiming to keep it near wings-level
Arrival
Start the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested.
What happened: The aircraft was flown onto the runway: the nose was barely raised and little of the sink was taken out, touching down at 246 fpm.
Watch for: Pitch attitude: rising steadily through the flare until the sink is checked.
See Arrival Landing
A good takeoff has a defined shape. It also has a defined end. For an airliner that's thrust reduction and acceleration, commonly somewhere around 1,000 to 1,500 ft above the airfield depending on the operator, while for a light aircraft it's established at Vy with the flaps on schedule. Most simmers have no defined end to their takeoff, which is exactly why it never gets judged.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 30 stages, 28 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,069 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,069 m of the 3,527 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 723 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in question was operated by a Boeing 777-300 aircraft. The aircraft began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 16 at Macau International Airport, with the aircraft taking off at a speed of 186 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 22 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 5 knots at 130 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it began its enroute climb, which started 3 miles south of Macau International Airport. The aircraft climbed from an altitude of 1,003 feet above sea level to 4,911 feet, an increase of 3,908 feet, in just 2 minutes and covering a distance of 9 nautical miles. This was followed by a level cruise that lasted 3 minutes and covered a distance of 15 nautical miles.
The aircraft continued its journey, with multiple enroute climbs and level cruises. One notable climb took place 2 miles southwest of Zhuhai Jinwan Airport, where the aircraft climbed from 5,004 feet to 27,550 feet, an increase of 22,546 feet, in 14 minutes and covering a distance of 91 nautical miles. Another notable climb took place 4 miles southwest of Zhanjiang Xintang Airport, where the aircraft climbed from 27,584 feet to 30,011 feet, an increase of 2,427 feet, in just 3 minutes and covering a distance of 28 nautical miles.
The aircraft also experienced multiple level cruises, with the longest one lasting 140 minutes and covering a distance of 978 nautical miles. The aircraft continued its journey, with multiple enroute climbs and level cruises, until it reached its final destination.
The final approach to runway 18R at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol took place from the north, with the aircraft heading 183.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,270 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing took place on runway 18R, which had a length of 3,527 meters. The touchdown point was 307 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 139 knots, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -225 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 2 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 3 knots at 150 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, and the headwind was 3 knots. The total landing distance was 1,987 meters, which was 56% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, a process that took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 5,815 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 849 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 117,183 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, achieving a score of 94.7%. The final approach to runway 18R was conducted from the north, with a heading of 183.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,270 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway, with a threshold speed of 147 knots, which was considered good. However, the touchdown speed of 139 knots was slightly faster than ideal. The touchdown point was located 307 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight deviation from the intended landing spot.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 2°C and a wind speed of 3 knots from a direction of 150°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 3 knots. These conditions did not appear to have a significant impact on the landing.
The total landing distance was 1,987 meters, which accounted for 56% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down and come to a stop within a reasonable distance. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, suggesting that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled descent during the landing.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating good control and stability during the approach and touchdown phases. However, there were some minor deviations from ideal performance, including a slightly fast touchdown speed and a touchdown point that was beyond the intended landing zone.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values