Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
See Arrival Rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the centreline.
At the 500 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,553 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,553 m of the 1,798 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 323 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Brussels Airport (EBBR), the Kodiak 100 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 19 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles. As the aircraft reached the end of runway 19, it initiated its departure roll, utilizing 731 meters, or 27% of the runway, to achieve liftoff at a speed of 86 knots. The local weather conditions at the time were characterized by a temperature of 8°C, with a wind speed of 4 knots from a direction of 290°, resulting in a negligible crosswind component.
As the aircraft transitioned to the enroute phase, it began its initial climb overhead Nossegem, Flanders, Belgium, ascending from an altitude of 266 feet above sea level to 1,992 feet, an increase of 1,726 feet, in just 3 minutes while covering a distance of 4 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, maintaining an altitude of 1,992 feet, before initiating a second climb phase, this time from 2,506 feet to 7,993 feet, an increase of 5,487 feet, in 7 minutes while covering 17 nautical miles. The aircraft continued to cruise at 7,993 feet before beginning its descent, which started 1 mile south-east of Sluipwijk, Provincie Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands, and resulted in a decrease of 6,851 feet in 4 minutes while covering 10 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 24 at Rotterdam The Hague Airport (EHRD) was initiated from the north-east, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 238.0° at an altitude of 1,153 feet above ground level, 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was executed with a touchdown speed of 59 knots, a touchdown rate of -172 feet per minute, and a touchdown distance of 322 meters, which was considered good. However, the runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 72.5 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,475 meters, or 82% of the runway. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 113 nautical miles, with a flight time of 54 minutes and a fuel consumption of 146 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 24 at EHRD Rotterdam The Hague Airport was initiated from the north east, heading 238.0° at 4 nm and 1,153 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the desired level at 84 kt, indicating a need for adjustment in the approach configuration.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft performed well, with a touchdown distance of 322 m and a touchdown speed of 59 kt, both of which were within acceptable limits. The touchdown rate of -172 fpm was also good, indicating a controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 8 °C and a light wind of 4 kt at 310°, contributed to a relatively smooth landing.
The total landing distance of 1,475 m was 82% of the runway length, indicating a good utilization of the available runway. However, the runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 72.5 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's heading during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 82.8%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values