Track every flight, analyse your performance,
and master your flying skills with My FS Flights
Get 10 flights free every month!
Tracked and analysed flights over miles
This flight was conducted using a Curtiss JN-4D aircraft, a biplane designed for training and recreational purposes. The flight began with an enroute climb from a starting point 1 mile west of Ploiesti, Romania, where the aircraft lifted off from an altitude of 767 feet above sea level. However, the climb was not significant, with the aircraft only maintaining the same altitude for the duration of the climb, which lasted for 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered an enroute level cruise phase, which started 1 mile west of Ploiesti and lasted for 69 minutes. During this period, the aircraft covered a distance of 48 nautical miles. The cruise phase was followed by an enroute descent, which began overhead Paulesti, Romania. The descent was from an altitude of 1,975 feet above sea level to 1,506 feet, a decrease of 469 feet in just 2 minutes, covering a distance of 2 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise phase, which started 1 mile north-west of Ploiesti and lasted for 4 minutes. This phase covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 27 at LRPW Gheorghe Valentin Bibescu was made from the east, with the aircraft heading 277.0 degrees at an altitude of 328 feet above ground level and a distance of 1 nautical mile from the runway.
The landing on runway 27 was conducted with a runway length of 938 meters. The threshold height was good, but the threshold speed was excessively high at 63 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 355 meters, but the touchdown speed was excessively fast at 56 knots. The touchdown rate was fair at -296 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.0 meters from the centreline.
The local weather conditions during the flight were characterized by a temperature of 15 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 1 knot from 270 degrees. There was no crosswind, but a headwind of 1 knot was present. The total flight distance was 54 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 53 minutes. The aircraft used 29 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started 1 mile west of Ploiesti (Prahova, Romania). Climbing from 767 ft asl to 767 ft asl, an increase of 0 ft in 1 minutes and covering less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 48 kt 48 kt min to max 48 kt |
48 | 48 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 12.1 ° 12.1 ° min to max 12.1 ° |
12.1 | 12.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.26 g 1.26 g min to max 1.26 g |
1.26 | 1.26 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 421 fpm 421 fpm min to max 421 fpm |
421 | 421 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 767 ft asl 767 ft asl min to max 767 ft asl |
767 | 767 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 17.3 ° 17.3 ° min to max 17.3 ° |
17.3 | 17.3 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 |
Enroute level cruise started 1 mile west of Ploiesti (Prahova, Romania) and lasted 69 minutes, covering 48 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 89.89 % |
Average altitude 1,693 ft asl 704 ft asl min to max 2,649 ft asl |
767 | 1,982 ft asl | |
| 0 % |
Average speed 56 kt 36 kt min to max 80 kt |
48 | 73 kt | |
| 76.9 % |
Average bank angle 7.6 ° 0.0 ° min to max 51.6 ° |
12.1 | 3.0 ° | |
| 84 % |
Average g force 1.01 g -0.06 g min to max 1.69 g |
1.26 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 8.7 ° -15.5 ° min to max 24.9 ° |
17.3 | 0.6 ° | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 21:20:32 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 21:20:32 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 21:20:32 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 21:28:56 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 21:28:57 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 21:33:19 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 21:33:22 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 21:34:54 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 21:36:19 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 21:46:12 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 21:46:26 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 21:47:02 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 21:47:17 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 21:56:00 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 21:56:11 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 21:56:40 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 21:56:42 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 21:57:37 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 21:57:45 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 21:59:03 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:00:39 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:00:41 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:00:43 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:00:44 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:00:49 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:01:02 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:01:29 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:05:09 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:05:16 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:06:37 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:07:10 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:09:19 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:09:56 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:11:40 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:12:01 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:19:53 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:20:33 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:20:40 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:20:44 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:20:45 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:20:48 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:20:49 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:20:55 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:21:43 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:21:57 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:22:21 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:22:50 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 22:25:38 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 22:25:44 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:26:30 |
Enroute descent started overhead Paulesti (Prahova, Romania). Descent from 1,975 ft asl to 1,506 ft asl, a decrease of 469 ft in 2 minutes and covering 2 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 75 kt 63 kt min to max 82 kt |
73 | 63 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 4.2 ° 0.2 ° min to max 14.8 ° |
3.7 | 1.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.72 g min to max 1.12 g |
0.72 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -314 fpm -980 fpm min to max 595 fpm |
-382 | 595 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,664 ft asl 1,422 ft asl min to max 1,975 ft asl |
1,975 | 1,506 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.6 ° -5.1 ° min to max 9.2 ° |
-4.1 | 9.2 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:28:16 |
Enroute level cruise started 1 mile north west of Ploiesti (Prahova, Romania) and lasted 4 minutes, covering 4 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average altitude 1,274 ft asl 907 ft asl min to max 1,625 ft asl |
1,516 | 907 ft asl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 65 kt 42 kt min to max 80 kt |
62 | 58 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 7.0 ° 0.1 ° min to max 29.2 ° |
0.5 | 15.5 ° | |
| 90.57 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.17 g min to max 1.50 g |
0.98 | 0.98 g | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.9 ° -15.3 ° min to max 20.4 ° |
9.2 | 5.3 ° | |
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:28:41 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:30:00 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:30:30 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:30:40 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:31:23 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:31:29 |
Approaching runway 27 at LRPW Gheorghe Valentin Bibescu from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 328 ft agl to 18 ft agl. A decrease of 310 ft in 40 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle 1.8 ° 1.0 ° min to max 3.4 ° Target 3.0 ° |
3.4 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 65 kt 60 kt min to max 72 kt |
60 | 63 kt | |
| 48.8 % |
Heading variation -0.4 ° -0.8 ° min to max 1.8 ° |
1.8 | -0.8 ° | |
| 53.98 % |
Average bank angle 8.0 ° 0.6 ° min to max 20.0 ° |
8.2 | 4.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.76 g min to max 1.10 g |
0.99 | 1.06 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -305 fpm -886 fpm min to max -124 fpm |
-226 | -287 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 69 ft agl 18 ft agl min to max 328 ft agl |
328 | 18 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 2.8 ° -4.4 ° min to max 4.3 ° |
3.6 | 4.2 ° | |
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Activated at 22:32:17 |
|||
| Info |
Overspeed Warning Deactivated at 22:32:23 |
Landing on runway 27 at LRPW Gheorghe Valentin Bibescu, runway length 938 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was excessively high at 63 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 0 % |
Threshold speed was excessively high at 63 kt. Target 40 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 82.29 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 74 % |
Heading variation -0.5 ° -1.2 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
-0.8 | -0.3 ° | |
| 80.75 % |
Average bank angle 5.0 ° 0.0 ° min to max 9.3 ° |
3.9 | 7.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.83 g min to max 1.11 g |
1.06 | 0.94 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 60 kt 56 kt min to max 63 kt |
63 | 56 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -59 fpm -296 fpm min to max 110 fpm |
-280 | -296 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 13 ft agl 5 ft agl min to max 16 ft agl |
16 | 5 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.4 ° 1.9 ° min to max 7.0 ° |
4.2 | 2.0 ° |
Touchdown distance was good at 355 m. Touchdown speed at 56 kt was excessively fast. Touchdown rate was fair at -296 fpm. Runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.0 m from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 1 kt at 270 °. Crosswind: 0 kt Headwind: 1 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 92.9 % |
Touchdown VSI was -296 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 355 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 0 % |
Speed at touchdown 56 kt Target below 36 kt |
|||
| 96.47 % |
Runway alignment max 4.02 m 3.47 m right |
-2.83 | -4.02 m | |
| 28.9 % |
Average bank angle 5.2 ° 3.4 ° min to max 7.7 ° |
7.7 | 3.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.25 g 0.94 g min to max 1.46 g |
0.94 | 1.21 g | |
| 40 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 55 kt 55 kt min to max 56 kt |
56 | 55 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.3 ° 2.0 ° min to max 7.5 ° |
2.0 | 7.5 ° |
The Curtiss JN-4D aircraft successfully landed on runway 27 at LRPW Gheorghe Valentin Bibescu, but with some notable areas for improvement. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 277.0° at 1 nautical mile and 328 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on the runway, which has a length of 938 meters.
The threshold height was satisfactory, but the threshold speed was excessively high at 63 knots. This indicates that the pilot may have been able to slow down more efficiently before touchdown. The touchdown distance of 355 meters was good, suggesting that the pilot had sufficient control over the aircraft's descent. However, the touchdown speed of 56 knots was excessively fast, which may have put additional stress on the aircraft's landing gear.
The touchdown rate of -296 feet per minute (fpm) was fair, indicating that the pilot had some control over the aircraft's descent rate. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.0 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's approach path.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 15°C and a wind speed of 1 knot from 270°. There was no crosswind, but a slight headwind of 1 knot was present. These conditions would have made the landing relatively straightforward, but the pilot's performance could still be improved upon. Overall, the landing was satisfactory, but there is room for improvement in terms of speed control and alignment.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values