Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Raise the gear lever promptly once a positive climb is confirmed, before reaching the target retraction height.
What happened: Gear retraction was delayed, with the gear not coming up until 0 ft agl.
Watch for: Landing gear: up by the normal retraction gate
Arrival
Use small rudder inputs against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline during rollout.
What happened: During the rollout the aircraft drifted 136 m off the centreline.
Watch for: Runway centreline marks: hold the aircraft tracking straight down the centreline through rollout
See Arrival Rollout
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 13 stages, 11 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 10.3° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 2.2° off, against a 1° limit and speed 8 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 141 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,859 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,859 m of the 3,742 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 297 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.81 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport, the Airbus A320 began its takeoff roll on runway 13R, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 156 kt. The aircraft cleared the runway threshold in 1,404 meters, utilizing 47% of the available length. The climb phase commenced immediately after takeoff, with the aircraft ascending from 1,477 feet above sea level to 2,657 feet in just 1 minute, covering a distance of 2 nautical miles.
As the aircraft transitioned into the enroute level cruise phase, it leveled off at an altitude of 2,657 feet, maintaining a steady heading for 3 minutes while covering 13 nautical miles. The descent phase began shortly thereafter, with the aircraft descending from 2,436 feet to 791 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 5 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 31R was initiated from a position 1 mile south east of Peteri, with the aircraft aligning itself with the runway centerline at an altitude of 335 feet above ground level.
The landing was executed smoothly, with the aircraft touching down on the runway threshold at a speed of 133 kt and a touchdown distance of 297 meters. The touchdown rate was firm at -391 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. However, the runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 137 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,782 meters, utilizing 48% of the available runway length. The flight concluded with a total distance of 24 nautical miles, utilizing 354 kilograms of fuel and lasting 7 minutes.
The final approach to runway 31R at LHBP Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport from the south east was executed with a heading of 309.0° at 1 nm and 335 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and threshold speed of 134 kt. The aircraft maintained a steady descent, touching down at a speed of 133 kt, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown distance of 297 m was also good, indicating a well-controlled approach.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft exhibited a firm touchdown rate of -391 fpm, which is typical for a commercial airliner. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft centered on the runway. However, the rollout phase was marred by a significant deviation from the centreline, with the aircraft being excessively misaligned by 137.0 m. This suggests that the pilot may have experienced some difficulty in maintaining directional control during the rollout phase.
Despite the misaligned rollout, the overall landing performance was satisfactory, with a total landing distance of 1,782 m, which is 48% of the runway length. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 15 °C and a light wind of 2 kt at 67°, did not pose any significant challenges to the landing. The score for this landing was 86.0%, indicating a good overall performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values