Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.7 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 14 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate for a circuit: seven checks where the approach path is 300 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate is an instrument-approach check and does not apply.
At the 300 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,116 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,116 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 150 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 34 at RPSM Maasin Airport. The Cessna 152 aircraft accelerated down the runway, covering a distance of 371 meters, which was 33% of the runway's length. The liftoff speed was achieved at 61 knots, marking the start of the flight.
As the aircraft entered the local airspace, the pilot encountered a calm weather condition with a temperature of 15 degrees Celsius and a gentle wind of 1 knot from a direction of 269 degrees. The crosswind component was minimal, at 1 knot, while the headwind component was zero. The pilot then initiated a left-hand pattern entry from runway 34, completing the maneuver in less than 1 nautical mile in 16 seconds.
The aircraft continued to follow the left-hand pattern, executing a crosswind turn from runway 34. This turn was completed in less than 1 nautical mile in 30 seconds. The pilot then proceeded to the downwind leg, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile and making a turn at an angle of 70.9 degrees relative to the runway. The downwind leg itself was 2 nautical miles long and took 69 seconds to complete.
As the aircraft approached the base leg, the pilot initiated a turn, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile and making a turn at an angle of 33.2 degrees relative to the runway. The base leg was then completed in less than 1 nautical mile in 32 seconds. The final turn was executed in less than 1 nautical mile in 12 seconds, setting the aircraft up for a final approach to runway 34 from the south.
The final approach was made at a heading of 334.0 degrees, 1 nautical mile from the runway, and at an altitude of 467 feet above ground level. The aircraft touched down on the runway, covering a distance of 149 meters. The touchdown speed was 38 knots, which was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate was smooth at -113 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating a well-executed landing.
The flight was completed with a total distance of 6 nautical miles, taking 5 minutes to cover this distance. The aircraft used 2 kilograms of fuel during the flight. Overall, the flight was characterized by a smooth and controlled execution of all phases of flight, culminating in a good landing on runway 34 at RPSM Maasin Airport.
The Cessna 152 aircraft successfully landed at RPSM Maasin Airport, achieving a score of 99.8%. The final approach to runway 34 was conducted from the south, with the aircraft heading 334.0° at 1 nautical mile and 467 feet above ground level (agl). This indicates a precise and controlled approach, with the pilot maintaining a steady course and altitude.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway at a distance of 149 meters, which is considered good. The touchdown speed of 38 knots was also within acceptable limits, suggesting that the pilot had successfully managed the aircraft's descent and speed. The touchdown rate of -113 feet per minute (fpm) was smooth, indicating a gentle and controlled touchdown.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, which is a critical aspect of a safe landing. This suggests that the pilot had maintained a steady course and had not deviated from the centerline of the runway. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 15°C and a wind speed of 1 knot from 270°. This minimal wind made the landing even more challenging, but the pilot was able to successfully navigate the aircraft to the runway.
The threshold speed was slightly below the target speed of 54 knots, which may indicate that the pilot had taken a more cautious approach to the landing. However, this did not affect the overall outcome of the landing, which was successful and safe. Overall, the landing was a testament to the pilot's skill and experience, as well as the aircraft's performance and handling characteristics.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values