Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 21 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,694 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,694 m of the 3,356 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 452 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 90.2% is quite commendable and reflects a generally successful landing. While there were a few areas that could be improved upon, the overall performance was solid.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was slightly above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly above target. This could indicate a need for better accuracy in maintaining the correct descent path and speed during approach. However, this could be easily rectified with more practice and focus on precision during approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is worth mentioning that the threshold height was below target, but the landing flare was very good. This demonstrates good control and technique during the landing phase. The slight deviation in threshold height could be corrected with more attention to altitude control during approach.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was smooth and the speed was a little above target. Additionally, the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone, which is a positive indicator. The slight deviation in speed could be improved with better speed management during the descent and approach phases.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off at 16.1m from the centerline. While this could be improved for more accurate landings, the deviation is not significant enough to detract from the overall successful landing.
In conclusion, while there are areas that could be refined for future landings, the overall performance of the aircraft landing was strong. With continued practice and attention to detail in areas such as descent path, speed management, and alignment, even better scores can be achieved. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in each phase of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values