Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 7.7°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 24 stages, 22 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway.
At the 305 m gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,023 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,023 m of the 2,977 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 460 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 09 at Djerba Zarzis International Airport (DTTJ) in Tunisia. The takeoff distance was 1,333 meters, which is 43% of the runway length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 158 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of 33°C temperature and winds of 21 knots at 49°. The crosswind was 13 knots, while the headwind was 16 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile east of the airport and continued for 23 minutes, covering a distance of 153 nautical miles. The aircraft climbed from an altitude of 321 meters above sea level to 10,689 meters above sea level, an increase of 10,367.5 meters.
After reaching the desired altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 8 miles west of Hammamet, Tunisia. This phase lasted for 61 minutes and covered a distance of 449 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, which started 16 miles southwest of Riomaggiore, Italy. The descent from 10,196 meters above sea level to 1,957 meters above sea level took 18 minutes and covered a distance of 95 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile southeast of Granozzo con Monticello, Italy. This phase lasted for 3 minutes and covered a distance of 12 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another descent, which started 2 miles east of Valle Lomellina, Italy. The descent from 1,764 meters above sea level to 1,495 meters above sea level took 2 minutes and covered a distance of 6 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started overhead Suardi, Italy. This phase lasted for 3 minutes and covered a distance of 8 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another descent, which started 1 mile east of Ottobiano, Italy. The descent from 1,344 meters above sea level to 1,187 meters above sea level took 2 minutes and covered a distance of 7 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile northwest of Gambolo, Italy. This phase lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 6 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another descent, which started 1 mile southeast of Cerano, Italy. The descent from 1,192 meters above sea level to 626 meters above sea level took 3 minutes and covered a distance of 10 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 35R at Milan Malpensa International Airport (LIMC) was made from the south, heading 349.0° at 4 nautical miles and 397.5 meters above ground level. The landing on runway 35R, which is 2,977 meters long, was successful, with a touchdown point 48 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was slightly above the target at 151 knots, while the touchdown rate was firm at -1.7 meters per second.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 25°C temperature and winds of 7 knots at 240°. The crosswind was 7 knots, while the tailwind was 2 knots. The total landing distance was 1,945 meters, which is 65% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 12.1 meters from the centerline.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 1
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at LIMC Milan Malpensa International Airport, achieving a score of 95.1%. The final approach to runway 35R was conducted from the south, with the aircraft heading 349.0° at an altitude of 397.5 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down 48 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is slightly outside the ideal landing spot. The touchdown speed of 144 knots was a bit faster than the target speed, indicating that the pilot may have applied a bit too much reverse thrust or failed to flare the aircraft sufficiently. However, the touchdown rate of -1.7 meters per second was firm, suggesting that the aircraft was well-controlled during the landing.
The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained a stable and aligned approach to the runway. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 25°C and a gentle wind of 7 knots from 240°. The crosswind component was 7 knots, while the tailwind component was a relatively minor 2 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,945 meters was 65% of the available runway length, which is a reasonable distance considering the aircraft's weight and the wind conditions. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 12.1 meters from the centerline, indicating that the pilot may have applied a bit too much rudder or failed to maintain a straight course during the rollout.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there were a few minor issues that could be addressed to improve the score. The pilot's ability to maintain a stable and aligned approach, as well as their control of the aircraft during the landing and rollout, were key factors in the successful outcome.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values