Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,738 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 591 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Douglas DC-6B began with a 41-minute taxi from the parking area to the runway at KCVG Cincinnati Northern Kentucky International Airport. The departure roll on runway 18L covered 5 nm and the takeoff distance was 737m, representing 24% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 102 kn. The local weather at the time of departure included a temperature of 1°C with a 13 kn wind coming from 239° resulting in a 12 kn crosswind and a 7 kn headwind.
The enroute climb started 1 mile northwest of Florence, Kentucky, climbing from 1,903 ft asl to 12,238 ft asl in 10 minutes, covering 32 nm. The enroute level cruise began 4 miles south of Schroder Airport Owenton, Kentucky, lasting 72 minutes and covering 272 nm. The enroute descent started 3 miles southeast of Duluth, Georgia, descending from 12,545 ft asl to 4,188 ft asl in 9 minutes, covering 17 nm.
Another enroute level cruise session began 1 mile south of Lithonia, Georgia, lasting 2 minutes and covering 3 nm. The next descent started 3 miles north of Pinetree Heliport Cumming, Georgia, descending from 3,846 ft asl to 2,264 ft asl in 4 minutes, covering 8 nm. The final approach to runway 26R at KATL Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport began from the east at 4 nm and 1,239 ft agl, with the aircraft facing a heading of 270.0°.
The landing on runway 26R at KATL was completed with a touchdown point 155m beyond the touchdown zone, a touchdown speed of 90 kn, and a touchdown rate of -252 ft/m. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.6 m from the centerline. The local weather at the time of landing was 10°C with a 13 kn wind coming from 300°, resulting in a 7 kn crosswind and an 11 kn headwind. The total landing distance was 1,231 m, representing 45% of the runway length, with a slightly misaligned runway rollout alignment by 9.5 m from the centerline.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area in 6 minutes, covering less than 1 nm. The total flight distance covered was 345 nm over a duration of 101 minutes, using 2,150 kg of fuel.
Firstly, let's focus on the positive aspects of the aircraft landing score. The approach phase was well executed with good glideslope alignment, and the threshold speed being well above the target is commendable. This indicates good control and precision during the descent towards the runway.
Moving on to the landing phase, the threshold height being slightly above target is not a major concern as it still falls within an acceptable range. However, the poor landing flare is an area that definitely needs improvement. A proper landing flare is crucial for a smooth and safe touchdown, so ensuring that this aspect is worked on in future landings is key.
In the touchdown phase, the touchdown rate being fair is a positive sign, showing a decent level of control during the touchdown. However, the touchdown speed being a little fast at 90 knots is something to watch out for in future landings. It's important to aim for the target touchdown speed to ensure a safe and comfortable landing for passengers and crew.
Additionally, the touchdown point being 155 meters beyond the touchdown zone is a significant deviation and should be addressed. Landing within the designated touchdown zone is essential for safety reasons, so focusing on accurately landing within this zone is crucial.
Lastly, the slight misalignment of the runway touchdown position by 4.6 meters from the centerline is another area that could be improved upon. Aligning with the centerline is important for a safe and smooth landing, so ensuring proper alignment in future landings is recommended.
Overall, while there were some areas for improvement in this particular landing, there were also positive aspects to build upon. By focusing on improving the landing flare, touchdown speed, touchdown point, and runway alignment, future landings can be even more successful. Keep practicing and paying attention to these key elements to continue enhancing your aircraft landing skills. You're on the right track, and with dedication and practice, you can strive for even higher landing scores. Good luck!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values