Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Apply small rudder corrections at touchdown, aiming at a point at the far end of the runway, to stay on the centreline.
What happened: Touchdown drifted 7.8 m off the centreline, and landings like this usually carry that drift into the rollout, where the alignment error grew to 8.2 m.
Watch for: Runway centreline: aircraft tracking directly over it through touchdown and rollout.
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,092 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 428 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Airbus A320ceo taxied from the parking area to runway 21 at ESGG Göteborg Landvetter Airport, a movement that lasted 5 minutes and covered 1 nm.
During the departure roll on runway 21, the aircraft used a takeoff distance of 1,549 m, representing 47 % of the runway, and lifted off at 155 kt. Local weather was Temperature 17 °C, Wind 23 kt at 229 °, with a cross-wind component of 9 kt and a head-wind component of 21 kt.
Climb commenced 1 mile south-west of ESGG Göteborg Landvetter Airport, ascending from 1,491 ft asl to 30,008 ft asl, an increase of 28,517 ft achieved in 14 minutes while covering 80 nm.
Level cruise began 7 miles east of EKGR Grenaa Airfield, lasting 13 minutes and encompassing 87 nm.
Descent started 2 miles west of Faaborg, descending from 29,986 ft asl to 1,148 ft asl, a decrease of 28,838 ft completed in 20 minutes over 97 nm.
The final approach to runway 23 at EDDH Hamburg Helmut Schmidt Airport involved a descent from 1,153 ft agl to -125 ft agl in 110 seconds, with the aircraft scoring on the stabilisation gates.
Landing on runway 23, which is 3,092 m long, occurred with good threshold height and a threshold speed that was good at 137 kt. The touchdown point was 164 m beyond the touchdown zone; touchdown speed at 131 kt was a little fast and touchdown rate was perfect at minus 36 fpm. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 7.8 m from the centreline. Local weather reported Temperature 15 °C, Wind 5 kt at 240 °, cross-wind 1 kt and head-wind 5 kt.
The total landing distance recorded was 1,494 m, representing 48 % of the runway, and the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.2 m from the centreline.
After rollout, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a movement that took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
Overall, the flight covered a distance of 273 nm, required 59 (as reported) of time, and consumed 2,256 kg of fuel.
The Airbus A321 successfully landed on runway 07R at Frankfurt Airport (EDDF) with a score of 96.9%. The aircraft approached the runway from the southwest, heading 69.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,270 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot maintained a good threshold height, which is a crucial aspect of a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was recorded at 133 knots, which is within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown speed of 129 knots was slightly faster than desired, indicating that the pilot may have been able to flare the aircraft more effectively to achieve a smoother touchdown. The touchdown rate of -384 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, suggesting that the aircraft touched down with a moderate amount of force.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.6 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's alignment during the final approach. Despite this, the runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 5°C and a wind speed of 11 knots from a direction of 60°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 11 knots, which helped to reduce the aircraft's ground speed and make the landing more manageable.
The total landing distance of 1,195 meters was 30% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated good control and decision-making skills throughout the approach and landing phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values