Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,288 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 524 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First off, congratulations on achieving a landing score of 91.0%!
Let's break down the analysis of each phase of the landing to identify areas for improvement and further success:
Approach Phase: It is commendable that the glideslope alignment during the approach phase was excellent. This indicates strong piloting skills and a good understanding of aircraft control. Keep up the great work in maintaining precise glideslope alignment during future landings.
Landing Phase: While the threshold height was slightly above target, this can be easily adjusted with more practice and attention to detail. The area of improvement in this phase lies in the landing flare, which was noted as very poor. Focus on perfecting the landing flare technique to ensure a smoother touchdown and reduce the touchdown rate.
Touchdown Phase: Although the touchdown rate was hard and the speed was slightly above target, these factors can be improved through practice and fine-tuning your approach. Additionally, the touchdown point being 109m beyond the touchdown zone indicates a need for better judgment and timing in coordinating the landing. Aim for a more precise and on-target touchdown to improve overall landing performance.
Rollout Phase: The runway alignment being 6.0m from the centerline suggests the necessity for better alignment control during the rollout phase. Pay attention to maintaining a straight path and centerline alignment to enhance overall landing accuracy.
In conclusion, while the landing score of 91.0% is definitely something to be proud of, there is always room for improvement and growth. Use this detailed analysis as a guide to identify specific areas that require focus and practice. Maintain a positive attitude and keep striving for excellence in your landings. With dedication and perseverance, you can continue to elevate your skills and achieve even higher scores in the future. Good luck and happy flying!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values