Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
A crosswind landing is a geometry problem. The air mass you're flying in is moving sideways across the runway, and you need your ground track down the centreline with your wheels aligned to it at the moment of contact. There are two techniques that will help, the crab and the sideslip.
Read more in Crosswind Landings in the SimStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 6,593 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 6,593 ft of the 9,974 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,461 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport (KATL) on runway 26L, the Boeing 737-800 began its journey with a taxiing period of 12 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles to reach the runway. Following a smooth departure roll, the aircraft lifted off at a speed of 152 knots, utilizing 55% of the 5,492-foot runway. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 84°F, with a gentle 2-knot headwind from the east.
As the aircraft climbed to cruising altitude, it passed overhead College Park, Georgia, and continued its ascent to 37,835 feet above sea level, a gain of 35,834 feet in 21 minutes, covering 132 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise phase commenced 6 miles east of Woodstock, Alabama, and lasted for 13 minutes, during which the aircraft covered 335 nautical miles. Subsequently, the aircraft began its descent 7 miles northwest of Pitkin, Louisiana, and descended from 37,999 feet to 1,402 feet above sea level, a decrease of 36,597 feet in 27 minutes, covering 133 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 27 at George Bush Intercontinental Houston Airport (KIAH) was initiated from the east, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 269.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,299 feet above ground level.
The Boeing 737-800 landed on runway 27 at KIAH, utilizing 64% of the 9,971-foot runway, with a total landing distance of 6,340 feet. The touchdown point was 1,108 feet beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 140 knots, slightly above the target. The touchdown rate was excellent at -86 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. Following a taxiing period of 4 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile, the aircraft arrived at the parking area. The total flight distance was 611 nautical miles, with a flight time of 78 minutes, and the aircraft utilized 10,421 pounds of fuel.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 27 at KIAH George Bush Intercontinental Houston Airport with a score of 90.3%. The aircraft approached the runway from the east, heading 269.0° at 4 nm and 1,299 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height of 56 ft agl, slightly above the target. The threshold speed of 148 kt was also slightly above the target, but still within acceptable limits.
As the aircraft made contact with the runway, it touched down 1,108 ft beyond the touchdown zone at a speed of 140 kt, which was a little fast. However, the touchdown rate of -86 fpm was excellent, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft tracking the centreline closely. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 79°F and a gentle wind of 6 kt at 150°, resulting in a crosswind of 6 kt and a tailwind of 3 kt.
The total landing distance of 6,340 ft was 64% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 36 ft from the centreline, which could be improved upon. Overall, the landing was satisfactory, with a good approach quality and a smooth touchdown, but with some room for improvement in terms of touchdown speed and rollout alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values