Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
In the last part of the flare, hold a little more back pressure to fully arrest the sink before the mains touch down.
What happened: Threshold speed and height were within limits, and the flare began on time and arrested the sink normally; even so, the touchdown rate was 260 fpm, a firm touchdown.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smooth, gentle rate at touchdown
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out. These checks are the approach's score.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 4.4° off, against a 1° limit and wings 10° of bank, against a 10° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,732 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,732 m of the 2,728 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 489 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
A Boeing 737-800 departed from Seattle–Tacoma International Airport (KSEA) on runway 16L, taking off with a distance of 1,718 meters, which accounted for 47% of the available runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 159 knots, and the local temperature at the time was 19 degrees Celsius. Following a short taxiing period of 8 minutes and covering 2 nautical miles, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started 1 mile southwest of the airport and reached an altitude of 36,240 feet above sea level in 19 minutes, covering a distance of 112 nautical miles.
The enroute climb was followed by a level cruise, which began 14 miles south of Lake Cowichan, British Columbia, Canada, and lasted for 80 minutes, covering a distance of 594 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent, which began 16 miles southwest of Petersburg, Alaska, and ended at an altitude of 6,129 feet above sea level in 18 minutes, covering a distance of 110 nautical miles. The descent was followed by a brief level cruise, which lasted for 2 minutes and covered 7 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, which started 3 miles north of Hawk Inlet Seaplane Base, Alaska, and ended at an altitude of 357 feet above sea level in 10 minutes, covering a distance of 29 nautical miles.
The Boeing 737-800 then began its final approach to runway 26 at Juneau International Airport (PAJN), which was aligned from the east. The aircraft touched down on the runway with a distance of 330 meters, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown speed was slightly above the target at 144 knots, and the touchdown rate was good at -182 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.1 meters from the centerline. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, taking 1 minute and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 859 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 5,812 kilograms of fuel during the flight, which lasted for 140 minutes.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 26 at PAJN Juneau International Airport with a good threshold height, allowing the pilots to maintain a stable approach. The threshold speed was slightly above the target at 144 kt, but the touchdown distance of 330 m was well within acceptable limits. The aircraft's touchdown speed of 135 kt was a little fast, but the touchdown rate of -182 fpm was good, indicating a controlled descent.
As the aircraft made contact with the runway, it was slightly misaligned by 3.1 m from the centreline, but this deviation was minor. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 11 °C and a gentle headwind of 6 kt, contributed to a smooth landing. The total landing distance of 1,490 m, which accounted for 58% of the runway length, was reasonable given the aircraft's weight and the prevailing wind conditions.
During the rollout phase, the aircraft maintained very good alignment with the centreline, demonstrating the pilots' skill and control. The landing was overall a good one, with a score of 99.4%, reflecting the crew's proficiency and adherence to standard operating procedures.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values