Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down before tight turns
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,709 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,709 m of the 2,738 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 583 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 92.7% reflects a strong performance with some areas for improvement. Let's break down each phase of the landing process and see where adjustments can be made to achieve an even higher score.
During the Approach Phase, it's important to ensure that the descent path remains within the glideslope limit and that speed is kept at the target. While the descent path was below the glideslope limit, the slight deviation in speed may have affected the overall accuracy of the approach. By focusing on maintaining a consistent descent path and speed, future landings can be even more precise.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's great to see that the threshold height and landing flare were executed well. However, the firm touchdown rate and slightly higher speed than target are areas to pay attention to. By working on achieving a smoother touchdown and landing at the desired speed, the overall quality of the landing can be further enhanced.
In the Touchdown Phase, the fact that the touchdown point was beyond the designated zone and the runway touchdown position was off-center suggests a need for improved alignment during this critical phase. Paying close attention to the touchdown point and runway alignment will help ensure a more precise landing in the future.
As for the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being off-center by 10.5 m indicates a need to focus on maintaining a straight path down the runway during the rollout. By practicing and refining runway alignment techniques, the aircraft can be brought to a stop more efficiently and accurately.
Overall, this landing score of 92.7% is a commendable achievement, but there is always room for improvement. By analyzing the feedback provided for each phase of the landing process and making targeted adjustments in training and practice sessions, the aircraft can strive for even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the hard work and dedication to excellence in aviation!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values