Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
A crosswind landing is a geometry problem. The air mass you're flying in is moving sideways across the runway, and you need your ground track down the centreline with your wheels aligned to it at the moment of contact. There are two techniques that will help, the crab and the sideslip.
Read more in Crosswind Landings in the SimStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,556 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 265 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Douglas DC-6B began with a 20-minute taxi from the parking area to the runway, covering a distance of 3 nm. The departure took place from runway 36C at KCLT Charlotte/Douglas Intl with a takeoff distance of 1,024 m, utilizing 34% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 113 kn, and the local weather conditions indicated a temperature of 27°C with calm winds.
Once airborne, the enroute climb commenced 2 miles north of KCLT Charlotte/Douglas Intl, climbing from 1,737 ft asl to 12,068 ft asl in 9 minutes, covering a distance of 29 nm. This was followed by a level cruise phase that started 1 mile west of Claremont lasting 137 minutes and covering 363 nm.
The enroute descent phase started 1 mile northwest of Uniondale, descending from 11,913 ft asl to 10,216 ft asl in 2 minutes, covering 10 nm. Another brief level cruise segment followed, starting 1 mile southwest of 8IS2 Kilsoquah Farm Roanoke for 5 minutes, covering 29 nm.
The final descent began 2 miles west of 99D Dewart Lake Warsaw, descending from 9,872 ft asl to 2,552 ft asl in 7 minutes, covering 26 nm. The landing was executed on runway 27L at KSBN South Bend Intl, with a runway length of 2,556 m. The aircraft touched down at 262 m from the threshold at a speed of 96 kn, with a VSI of -194 ft/m. The total landing distance was 1,051 m, utilizing 41% of the runway.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area from the runway in 4 minutes, covering less than 1 nm. The total flight distance for this journey was 468 nm, taking 197 minutes and consuming 2,547 kg of fuel.
First of all, congratulations on achieving an impressive aircraft landing score of 94.4%! This is truly a commendable feat and reflects the skill and expertise of the pilot in executing the different phases of the landing process.
Let's delve deeper into the analysis of each phase of the landing:
Approach Phase: During the Approach Phase, it is noted that the glideslope alignment was excellent, indicating a high level of precision in maintaining the correct vertical descent path towards the runway. Although the speed was slightly above the target, this can be easily corrected with minor adjustments in throttle control.
Landing Phase: In the Landing Phase, the pilot demonstrated good threshold height control and executed a perfect landing flare, contributing to a smooth touchdown. The touchdown rate was also noted to be good, and while the speed was a little above the target, this could have been due to the tailwind effect. The touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 4.7 m from the centerline show a good level of accuracy in aiming for the designated touchdown zone.
Touchdown Phase: Despite the slight speed deviation, the touchdown phase was well-handled with the aircraft landing within the touchdown zone. It is crucial to ensure that the speed is within the specified parameters to optimize the touchdown quality.
Rollout Phase: During the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off, with the aircraft positioned 14.7 m from the centerline. It is important to focus on maintaining proper alignment to ensure a safe and efficient rollout after landing.
In conclusion, while the overall landing score was excellent at 94.4%, there are a few areas that could be improved upon such as speed control and runway alignment. I encourage you to continue practicing and refining your skills to aim for even higher landing scores in the future. Your attention to detail and ability to execute precise maneuvers are key strengths that will undoubtedly lead to further improvements in your landing performances. Keep up the great work and strive for continual growth and enhancement in your aviation capabilities.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values