Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 471 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 36 at ENZV Stavanger Airport, Sola, with a takeoff distance of 1,095 meters, which accounted for 44% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 161 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 4 degrees Celsius, a wind speed of 6 knots at 10 degrees, resulting in a 1-knot crosswind and a 6-knot headwind.
As the aircraft climbed out of Stavanger Airport, it began its enroute climb 1 mile north of the airport, rising from an altitude of 1,073 feet above sea level to 25,770 feet above sea level, an increase of 24,696 feet in 18 minutes, covering a distance of 100 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 8 miles west of Lunde, where the aircraft descended from 25,603 feet above sea level to 10,179 feet above sea level, a decrease of 15,424 feet in 10 minutes, covering a distance of 56 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise 2 miles northeast of Hyggen, lasting 5 minutes and covering 17 nautical miles. Another enroute descent started 3 miles southwest of Sundvollen, where the aircraft descended from 10,191 feet above sea level to 1,940 feet above sea level, a decrease of 8,251 feet in 8 minutes, covering a distance of 24 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, was made from the south, heading 16.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,260 feet above ground level. The landing was executed on runway 01L, which had a length of 3,594 meters. The threshold height at 57 feet above ground level was slightly above the target, but the threshold speed was good at 134 knots. The touchdown point was 52 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 131 knots, but the touchdown rate was smooth at -128 feet per minute.
The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -4 degrees Celsius, a wind speed of 6 knots at 20 degrees, resulting in a 0-knot crosswind and a 6-knot headwind. The total landing distance was 992 meters, which accounted for 28% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, and the taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 3 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 203 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 48 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 2,104 kilograms.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 99.7%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 16.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,260 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 131 knots, which was slightly above the target speed.
The touchdown point was located 52 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. However, the touchdown speed and rate were still within acceptable limits. The aircraft's descent rate was smooth at -128 feet per minute (fpm), and the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -4°C and a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 20°. The crosswind component was negligible, while the headwind component was 6 knots, which helped to slow down the aircraft during the landing. The total landing distance was 992 meters, which accounted for 28% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was properly configured and controlled during the landing.
The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway after touchdown and was able to maintain a stable and controlled roll-out. Overall, the landing was executed with precision and control, and the aircraft was able to come to a stop within a short distance from the touchdown point.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values