Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the glidepath
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 16 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: glideslope 5.0° against the runway's 3°.
At the 500 ft gate: speed 18 kt FAST on the reference speed of 142 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,590 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 395 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Stavanger Airport, Sola, the Airbus A320 began its journey with a taxiing phase that lasted 7 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. Upon reaching the runway, the aircraft initiated its departure roll on runway 36, utilizing 1,223 meters, or 49% of the runway's length, to achieve liftoff at a speed of 166 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 10°C, with a wind speed of 21 knots at 329°, resulting in a 10-knot crosswind and an 18-knot headwind.
As the aircraft climbed away from Stavanger Airport, it began its enroute climb, ascending from 1,123 feet above sea level to 27,009 feet in 17 minutes, covering a distance of 120 nautical miles. The climb phase was characterized by a significant increase in altitude, with the aircraft rising by 25,886 feet. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, lasting 3 minutes and covering 13 nautical miles, before initiating a descent phase. The descent from 26,997 feet to 10,998 feet took 10 minutes and covered 62 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a final descent phase, descending from 11,012 feet to 2,666 feet in 7 minutes and covering 29 nautical miles.
As the Airbus A320 approached Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, it initiated its final approach to runway 01L from the south, aligning with the runway at 4 nautical miles and 1,978 feet above ground level. The aircraft landed on the runway, utilizing 402 meters, or 37% of the runway's length, to touch down at a speed of 136 knots. The touchdown rate was fair at -207 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 3 minutes to cover a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 233 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 47 minutes and a fuel consumption of 2,034 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen from the south, heading 16.0 ° at 4 nm and 1,978 ft agl, was executed with good quality, characterized by a stable and controlled descent. The aircraft maintained a steady rate of descent, ultimately resulting in a good threshold height. The threshold speed was also well-managed, reaching 143 kt as required.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was a little fast at 136 kt, but the touchdown distance of 402 m was within acceptable limits. The touchdown rate of -207 fpm was fair, indicating a moderate deceleration. Notably, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 8 °C and wind at 15 kt from 349 °, resulted in a crosswind of 7 kt and a headwind of 14 kt, which the pilot effectively managed.
The total landing distance of 1,327 m, accounting for 37% of the runway length, was reasonable. The runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was executed with high precision, resulting in a score of 99.2%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values