Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Rotate sooner, bringing the nose up at 75 kt rather than letting speed build further.
What happened: You lifted off at 92 kt against a rotation target of 75 kt, rotating late in the ground roll.
Watch for: Watch airspeed and rotate at the target of 75 kt.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on final to bleed speed back to 71 kt before crossing the threshold.
What happened: You crossed the threshold at 86 kt, 15 kt above the 71 kt target.
Watch for: Airspeed, targeting 71 kt at the threshold.
See Arrival Landing
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: no landing flap set and speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,082 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 490 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Rotterdam The Hague Airport (EHRD), the Kodiak 100 began its journey with a taxiing phase that lasted 9 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. Upon reaching the runway, the aircraft initiated its departure roll on runway 24, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 92 knots. The takeoff distance of 332 meters accounted for 18% of the runway length, with a local wind of 6 knots at 320 degrees contributing to a slight headwind component.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it transitioned through various phases of flight. The initial enroute climb from 999 feet above sea level to 1,697 feet above sea level, covering 4 nautical miles, was achieved in just 1 minute. The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, lasting 5 minutes and covering 14 nautical miles, before initiating another climb phase from 2,076 feet above sea level to 7,594 feet above sea level, an increase of 5,518 feet in 7 minutes. The aircraft continued to cruise at various altitudes, with a notable descent phase from 8,006 feet above sea level to 3,139 feet above sea level, a decrease of 4,867 feet in 5 minutes. The final approach to Brussels Airport (EBBR) was initiated from the east, with a heading of 250.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,302 feet above ground level.
The Kodiak 100 landed on runway 25L at EBBR, with a touchdown point 60 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed of 55 knots was within acceptable limits, and the touchdown rate of -99 feet per minute was excellent. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.0 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance of 841 meters accounted for 27% of the runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering a distance of 2 nautical miles in 9 minutes. The total flight distance was 109 nautical miles, with a flight time of 52 minutes and a fuel consumption of 126 kilograms.
The aircraft touched down on runway 25L at EBBR Brussels Airport with a good threshold height, but the threshold speed was slightly above the desired level at 87 kt. The touchdown point was 60 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight over-run. However, the touchdown speed of 55 kt was well within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -99 fpm was excellent, demonstrating a smooth and controlled descent.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 4.0 meters, which may have been due to the crosswind component of 6 kt. Despite this, the local weather conditions, with a temperature of 7 °C and a headwind of 3 kt, were generally favorable for the landing. The total landing distance of 841 meters was 27% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range.
The rollout phase was characterized by very good alignment, with the aircraft staying close to the centreline. Overall, the landing was considered to be of high quality, with a score of 97.4%. The only areas for improvement were the slightly high threshold speed and the slight misalignment of the touchdown point from the centreline.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values