Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Be on speed by the gate
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 16 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 41 kt FAST on the reference speed of 129 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,507 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 328 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Zvartnots International Airport (UDYZ) in Armenia, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey on runway 27. Taxiing to the runway took 4 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. Following a smooth departure roll, the aircraft lifted off the ground at a speed of 142 knots, utilizing 45% of the 1,797-meter runway. Local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 25°C, with a negligible wind of 1 knot from a direction of 49°.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it passed overhead Arevashat, marking the beginning of its enroute climb phase. The aircraft ascended from 3,750 feet above sea level to 40,007 feet, an increase of 36,257 feet, in 42 minutes and covering a distance of 309 nautical miles. Following a brief level cruise, the aircraft continued its journey, maintaining a steady altitude for 152 minutes and covering 1,153 nautical miles. The descent phase commenced 6 miles west of Volkovysk, Belarus, where the aircraft descended from 40,003 feet to 3,053 feet in 14 minutes and covering 105 nautical miles. A short level cruise phase followed, lasting 3 minutes and covering 11 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 19 at Vilnius International Airport (EYVI) was initiated from the north, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 202.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,304 feet above ground level. The landing was executed smoothly, with the aircraft touching down on the runway at a speed of 124 knots and a touchdown distance of 329 meters. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.1 meters from the centerline. Following a successful landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 1 minute and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,584 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 217 minutes and a fuel consumption of 9,311 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 19 at EYVI Vilnius International Airport with a good threshold height, indicating a well-executed approach. The threshold speed of 131 kt was within acceptable limits, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's descent and speed. The touchdown distance of 329 m was also satisfactory, indicating a controlled and stable approach.
However, the touchdown speed of 124 kt was slightly above the recommended threshold, resulting in a fair touchdown rate of -229 fpm. This may have been due to the pilot's decision to maintain a higher speed to ensure a stable approach, but it did result in a slightly longer rollout. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.1 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path.
Despite the minor deviations, the overall landing was satisfactory, with a total landing distance of 721 m, which accounted for 29% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase. The landing score of 99.2% reflects the pilot's overall proficiency and ability to execute a safe and controlled landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values