Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 9 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 21 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 21 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 21 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 520 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 12 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A320, then departed from runway 22R at EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,234 meters, which accounted for 41% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 171 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 13 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 15 knots from a direction of 230 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 15 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 2 miles south of Tarnby in Region Hovedstaden, Denmark. The climb took 27 minutes and covered a distance of 172 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from an altitude of 1,042 feet above sea level to 36,193 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,151 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 3 miles northeast of Brastad in Vaestra Goetaland County, Sweden. This phase lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 12 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 2 miles north of Rabbalshede in Vaestra Goetaland County, Sweden. The descent took 16 minutes and covered a distance of 90 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from an altitude of 35,861 feet above sea level to 8,699 feet above sea level, a decrease of 27,162 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 4 miles southwest of Kongsvinger in Innlandet, Norway. This phase lasted for 8 minutes and covered a distance of 29 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 3 miles south of Valer in Innlandet, Norway. The descent took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 29 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from an altitude of 8,164 feet above sea level to 1,967 feet above sea level, a decrease of 6,197 feet.
The final approach to runway 19R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen was made from the north, heading 196.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,287 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 19R, which had a length of 3,594 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 135 knots. The touchdown point was 101 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 131 knots. However, the touchdown rate was smooth at -108 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 8 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 13 knots from a direction of 210 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 12 knots. The total landing distance was 1,012 meters, which accounted for 28% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 4 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 340 nautical miles, and the flight took 74 minutes. The aircraft used 3,066 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 19R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 99.3%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 196.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,287 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot maintained a good threshold height, which is a crucial aspect of a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was recorded at 135 knots, which is within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown speed of 131 knots was slightly higher than the ideal speed, indicating that the pilot may have been able to flare the aircraft more effectively to achieve a smoother touchdown. The touchdown rate of -108 feet per minute (fpm) was smooth, indicating that the pilot had good control over the aircraft's descent.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, which is a testament to the pilot's skill and attention to detail. The local weather conditions were also favorable, with a temperature of 8°C and a wind speed of 13 knots at 210°. The crosswind component was minimal at 3 knots, while the headwind component was 12 knots, which helped to reduce the aircraft's ground speed and make the landing more manageable.
The total landing distance of 1,012 meters was 28% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. This indicates that the pilot had good control over the aircraft's descent and was able to touch down smoothly and efficiently. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, which suggests that the pilot had good control over the aircraft's direction and speed during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was a success, with the pilot demonstrating good skills and attention to detail. The score of 99.3% reflects the high level of proficiency and safety that was achieved during the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values